Greetings everyone! Daniel here, I’ve been working on Linkwarden part-time over the past few months.

Linkwarden is a self-hosted, open-source collaborative bookmark manager to collect, organize and archive webpages.

Key features:

  • 📸 Preserve webpages as Screenshot, PDF, etc. So you can access them even if they are taken down.
  • 👥 Collaborative, so you can share your collections with your friends and colleagues. You can also make them public and share them with the world.
  • 📱 Designed for every screen size, from widescreen monitors down to smartphones.
  • ⚡️ Open source and fully self-hostable!
  • ✨ And so many more features! (Literally, just didn’t want to make this post too long. Check out the Github repo and Website for more info…)

If you like what we’re doing, you can support the project by either starring ⭐️ the repo to make it more visible to others or by subscribing to the Cloud plan (which helps the project, a lot).

Things like mobile app (PWA) are already on the project roadmap and I’m so excited to share them with you in the future.

Feedback is always welcome, so feel free to share your thoughts!

Website: https://linkwarden.app

GitHub: https://github.com/linkwarden/linkwarden

  • beta_tester@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Cool app at first glance!

    I always wonder why some open source projects choose discord and not matrix?

        • lemon_nade@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          not a protocol issue

          It is. There’s no way for search engines to join all the servers and index them all, thus there’s no way to efficiently find information on them without already being there.

          • beta_tester@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Are you talking about crawlers not being able to index matrix messenges?

            It’s not a website, there’s no chat that’s being indexed by crawlers, afaik.

            You could index them if you wanted.

            A chat is meant to be ephemeral. Unlike with a forum where it is a goal to have long lasting information sharing.

            Usually you want to things for a project, one forum and one chat. The chat is more informal and not meant to replace a proper forum. You can basically chit chat in a chat but not in a forum.

            • shotgun_crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              The problem is many people are using them like forums, so a lot of potentially useful info is lost (which is more of an user issue than anything else)

            • Fredol@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s the problem, discussions should happen on the open web, not hidden in chatrooms

              • beta_tester@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                There’s nothijg hidden on matrix. You can verify yourself, go to the space of Nextcloud, GNOME, KDE, OPENSUSE, FEDORA, flatpak, neo store, libretube, etc. Nothing is hidden.

                • Fredol@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  it’s not literally hidden, but it’s not easily searchable because since it’s a chat, it’s not indexable on search engines. A forum is a better solution to avoid the same questions being asked 1000x and to expose great solutions and advices.

    • denast@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think Matrix suffers from some issues with large communities, for instance Graphene OS has already had to abandon 2-3 of their main group chats due to same bug and last time I checked (2-3 months ago) there has even been talks of switching to Discord. That is, just in case, a community of some of the most diehard privacy nerds btw

  • Lem453@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thank you for including oAuth options for sign on. Makes a big difference being able to use the same account for all the things like freshRSS, seafile, immich etc.

  • stackPeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I actually tried to build Raindrop.io-clone like this one one day, but never got the time to work fully on it… Congrats OP!

  • astraeus@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using ArchiveBox, this looks a bit more feature-full than ArchiveBox although it seems like ArchiveBox has been pretty stable. Anyone have experience with both, can vouch for the pros and cons?

    I may take some time to compare the two. After taking another look at Linkwarden I get the impression it may handle archiving pages differently than ArchiveBox, which isn’t a bad thing it may just not fit the usage of everyone who uses ArchiveBox. The presentation and UI look really good, which is something I find ArchiveBox suffers a bit from.

  • Cyberflunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Archivebox is in my obsidian workflow, it grabs every link in my vault and archives it. I didn’t see an API in linkwarden, perhaps I missed it.

    • eduardm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you have any particular way of organizing the links themselves? I’ve moved to hosting all my bookmarks in Obsidian as well and am curious as to how others go about it

      • Cyberflunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I treat links like atomic notes. I add as much detail as I feel like to each link, sometimes I go back and add tags and notes. Then I have an exceptionally poor process that attempts to go back to each link, get the archivebox archive and uses python to attempt to grab the article text (I tried using newspaper3k at first, but it’s unmaintained, so moved to readability). Then sticks the resulting link text into the note.

        Honestly It’s a mess, and I really haven’t figured out how to do link things together very well, but, for now, it’s my little disaster of a solution.

  • ericjmorey@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    What value can this bring me over features available using a Mozilla (Firefox) account and the Official Wayback Machine Browser Extension?

  • iarigby@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Amazing! Have wanted something like this for years, currently use raindrop but not fully, very hesitant of locking myself in. This looks very promising.

    • MashedTech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m very curious… Why do you feel locked in by raindrop? I like that it can regularly upload exports to my Google drive and I can Always download them as html and csv.

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can imagine that news orgs won’t like having publicly available backups of their subscriber only content. Is this a problem that has been considered?

    Also, somewhat related, are the plans to turn this a little bit into a P2P archive.org? I mean, if multiple people store snapshots of webpages at different times, the timeline could be rebuilt using their publicly available snapshots.

    CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah. I expect basically any publicly available instances to get C&Ds REAL fast.

      And a p2p archive.org will basically never work. For the same reasons that the various NSFW lemmy instances get defederated from almost instantly. Because there is room for discussion on sites that highlight nudity in movies. There isn’t much room to discuss when it is nothing but revenge porn, “fappening links”, ripped OF content, and (inevitably) child porn.

      Stuff like this… I am sure there are niches but I am not seeing a lot of benefit over either a folder or a notes app that lets me upload PDFs (or even just google drive). But once you try to build a “community” you are going to have the same moderation issues amplified a hundred fold.

  • 7fb2adfb45bafcc01c80@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wish it was database agnostic. And I’m slightly concerned about the version three rewrite.

    It does look awesome, and I’ll revisit it to see where things are in six months.

  • I need NOS@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thanks for your work. I look forward to installing this soon!

    Do you have any plans to support importing from similar services such as Raindrop, Omnivore, or Shiori?

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Has anyone been able to get the Firefox extension to work with a self-hosted installation? It’s not accepting my login address.