More than 250 billionaires and millionaires on Wednesday reiterated their call on elected representatives of the world’s leading economies to introduce higher taxes on the very richest in society.

In an open letter to political leaders gathered at the annual World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, the rich signatories said they wished to deliver a clear message: “Tax our extreme wealth.”

“We are surprised that you have failed to answer a simple question that we have been asking for three years: when will you tax extreme wealth?” the letter said.

“Our request is simple: we ask you to tax us, the very richest in society. This will not fundamentally alter our standard of living, nor deprive our children, nor harm our nations’ economic growth. But it will turn extreme and unproductive private wealth into an investment for our common democratic future.”

  • demonsword@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Fucking hypocrites. “Our request is simple: we ask you to tax us, the very richest in society" and then they let loose their army of lobbysts and lawyers to stop governments from even trying to tax them.

    • Jojo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well, yeah. Plausible deniability, my good Demonsword.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I mean, there’s a LOT of billionaires at this point. Are the ones saying this at Davos all (or largely) ones that are doing that lobbying?

      • demonsword@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        there’s a LOT of billionaires at this point

        you can’t even fill a small stadium if you gathered all of the world’s billionaires, its only a few thousand… 2-3k last time I’ve seen that statistic

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Ok, then, this would be 10% writing this letter, and my question wasn’t answered.

    • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      They could also commit to giving 10% of their personal income or 2.5% of the value of their ne worth (whichever is greater) to the most effective charities now, while they’re waiting for the taxes to come.

      Chris Anderson (of TED) has suggested this and had the math run, and worked out if every ultra wealthy person on record in the world did this it would generate enough money solve basically all pressing concerns to do with poverty and climate many times over (so we don’t even need all of them).

      It’s never going to happen though, because Chris hasn’t accounted for the fact that most people who acquire wealth to this degree are some degree of sociopathic or at the very least believe somehow they’re entitled to be as wealthy as they are. So we need government regulation. Problem is we need it everywhere all at once, or these people just move their wealth around which can still severely damage the economy. But some countries, especially smaller ones, need to be brave. Europe taxes their wealthy reasonably well, and it’s clear it makes living in those nations better. More need to lead by example.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        And yet, I was reading a similar thread yesterday, where most of the replies were critical and distrusting about one of the richest people giving most of his wealth to charity.

        Just like they are not all the same and some will never be satisfied, the same is true of Lemmy