• danhab99@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    The whole point of side loading apps is to not need the app store. One of the most important features of an app store is to distribute and update apps. Storage and bandwidth isn’t free, but it is quite cheap.

    I’m sorry if it hurts apples feelings when we tell them they’re not allowed to charge for every aspect of their hardware. But if they didn’t want us to own our iPhones then they shouldn’t have sold them.

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    8 months ago

    What a shitshow. I didn’t see the whole story, but which is it: the regulators didn’t see all these ridiculous demands coming, or intentionally left loopholes in the legislation that basically allowed apple to retain their control and even profit from it? What was their original intent?

    • Darorad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Probably didn’t see them, Epic’s already suing again because of their compliance plan.

  • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 months ago

    Can someone help me understand: marketplace makers will need to prove they have access to $ 1 million. Then Apple will charge 50 cents per marketplace install? So that means no possibility of a 100% free store for open source apps. Is that correct?

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Non-Profits are exempt and nearly all large open source projects are non-profits. Small apps are also exempt - the 50c fee only applies if at least 2% of people in the EU use your app.

      … however it seems like these exemptions might not apply to third party app stores for some reason.

      • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        8 months ago

        If that’s the case, then it really defeats the purpose of the whole 3rd party store idea for me. Most apps I would consider installing are open source projects.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 months ago

    “App store is not a monopoly”

    “We’re going to defend this non-monopoly till our dying breath”

  • t0m5k1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Now that Apple are aggressively displaying their monopolistic attitude to anything 3rd party and their wanton greed. I wonder if we’ll see regulators going harder on them.

    I very much doubt it and fully expect the regulators to effectively say “Oh well we told them and gave them parameters!”

    Edit: All their products are fucking over priced, When YOU purchase YOUR phone YOU should be able to do what YOU want with it. Disagree? FUCK YOU

    Apple are clearly fleecing anyone who purchases their shit and will continue to fuck you at every opportunity.

  • misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    Delaying the inevitable. The fines that are coming are inevitable too but for Apple it’s just a cost of running their business.

      • misk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Apple revenue in 2023 was ~$380b and their cash reserves were ~$160b. They can take a couple of worst case scenario fines technically, especially given that they’d be challenged in courts for years. Just makes you realize how important that 30% cut is for them.

  • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    Uh, for that kind of money I could start my own Top Level Domain.

    Of course, in this interest rate economy, I would only dare create one dedicated to sharing cat pictures or pornography. Anything else sounds too risky.

    • Nougat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      You can honestly start your own TLD for a lot less with any DNS server. That doesn’t mean anyone else will necessarily use it, but you can.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    God bless the EU for taking this fight, and many others, on behalf of all of us. Only major entity actually making an effort at the moment.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    No awards to anyone who correctly guessed that Apple would drag their feet on this and put up as much resistance as they could possibly get away with.

  • Rand0mA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hasnt apple crashed and burned yet. Why are so many shiny hunting round edged magpies still sucking apples pecker

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I feel every other hardware manufacturer with a store that sells software for it should be held to the same rules then… Xbox, PlayStation, Nintendo…

  • soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Honestly, it doesn’t surprise nor please me that they’re looking exclusively for the corporations with the large amounts of money capable of running a full system, as opposed to the random Joe down the street running an f-droid repository.