• KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    that’s how.

    one of the 3 LEDs can have 256 levels of brightness (off included)

    take that to the power of three, and you have 16 million colours.

    but no mortal can actually tell the difference between 255, 255, 255 and 255, 254, 255.

    • funkajunk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      but no mortal can actually tell the difference between 255, 255, 255 and 255, 254, 255.

      Maybe YOU can’t, but don’t speak for the rest of us 😤

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, essentially the same sourcery behind every pixel of any modern display. The bulb is one pixel.

      So… Wait… Does this mean thousands of Hue bulbs can be a display screen? Has this been done?

      • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        those really huge displays are often millions of individual RGB LEDs. it would just be a software nightmare to do with hue bulbs.

          • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I’m guessing you’d hit interference at some point.

            But also latency would be bad and you almost definitely couldn’t synchronize them well.

            • Hyperlon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yeah, I’ve done something similar with ~120 wifi bulbs for a light show that responded to music and that worked fairly well but I doubt it would have worked with more than a few hundred.

            • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yeah, fair point. It would be no good to have each pixel of an enormous display doing its own processing, and trying to wirelessly command that many lights at once doesn’t seem possible at all.

    • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Was going to say “what a high quality answer”, then I saw you have twice the votes the post has. Well deserved.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      And a 4K TV with 10-bit HDR support can show

      (2^10 )^3 × 3840 × 2160 = 8,906,044,184,985,600

      different images.