JPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agodotnet developerprogramming.devimagemessage-square84fedilinkarrow-up11.37Karrow-down18
arrow-up11.36Karrow-down1imagedotnet developerprogramming.devJPDev@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square84fedilink
minus-squareUndercoverUlrikHD@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down1·1 year agoSay whatever you want about Microsoft, but they don’t mess around with backwards compatibility.
minus-squareriodoro1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·1 year agoIt’s easy to be backwards compatible when you’re backwards in general.
minus-squareHonytawk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·1 year agoWell, better to be backwards with backwards compatibility than to just be backwards. looks at Apple
minus-squarenilloc@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-21 year agoThey probably search for windows n(t) somewhere too ;)
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year ago it could’ve just been windows nine. or any other word that isn’t a number But “nine” is a word that is a number
deleted by creator
Say whatever you want about Microsoft, but they don’t mess around with backwards compatibility.
It’s easy to be backwards compatible when you’re backwards in general.
Well, better to be backwards with backwards compatibility than to just be backwards.
looks at Apple
They probably search for windows n(t) somewhere too ;)
But “nine” is a word that is a number