misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前Just 137 crypto miners use 2.3% of total U.S. power — government now requiring commercial miners to report energy consumptionwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square284fedilinkarrow-up1879arrow-down129cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1850arrow-down1external-linkJust 137 crypto miners use 2.3% of total U.S. power — government now requiring commercial miners to report energy consumptionwww.tomshardware.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前message-square284fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareRubberDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up111arrow-down2·2 年前Electricity is too cheap for these uses.
minus-squareAniki 🌱🌿@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up95arrow-down1·2 年前Why is commercial power so cheap and residential so expensive? We could fix two problems by balancing that back.
minus-squareDeceptichum@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up67arrow-down1·2 年前Because companies > people in the eyes of the state.
minus-squarejust_another_person@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·2 年前It depends on which state, which is even more sad.
minus-squarejoekar1990@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 年前Something something job creators….something something trickle down
minus-squareGeneral_Effort@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down11·edit-22 年前It’s more like companies = jobs in the eyes of voters. ETA: What’s with the downvotes? You guys think this is wrong?
minus-squareAniki 🌱🌿@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·2 年前I have never once gave a flying fuck about a nebulous concept of “jobs.”
minus-squareGeneral_Effort@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down5·edit-22 年前Sounds like you are in a very good position to appreciate how the average voter feels about this. ETA: I think we’d all be better off if people had a more realistic and practical attitude to jobs.
Electricity is too cheap for these uses.
Why is commercial power so cheap and residential so expensive? We could fix two problems by balancing that back.
Because companies > people in the eyes of the state.
It depends on which state, which is even more sad.
Something something job creators….something something trickle down
It’s more like companies = jobs in the eyes of voters.
ETA: What’s with the downvotes? You guys think this is wrong?
I have never once gave a flying fuck about a nebulous concept of “jobs.”
Sounds like you are in a very good position to appreciate how the average voter feels about this.
ETA: I think we’d all be better off if people had a more realistic and practical attitude to jobs.