A cargo ship that was struck by a Houthi ballistic missile on Monday has created an 18-mile long oil slick in the Red Sea as it continues to take on water, two US officials said Friday.

The M/V Rubymar — a Belize-flagged, UK-registered, Lebanese-owned vessel — was carrying 41,000 tons of fertilizer when it was struck on Monday by one of two ballistic missiles fired from Houthi territory in Yemen.

US Central Command said the ship is currently anchored as it takes on water. “The Houthis continue to demonstrate disregard for the regional impact of their indiscriminate attacks, threatening the fishing industry, coastal communities, and imports of food supplies,” US Central Command said.

  • livus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is especially annoying because 6 months ago there was an amazing collaboration between both sides in the Red Sea to enable an international team to remove oil from a wrecked tanker.

    All the people involved thought it was a great framework for more peaceful negotiations.

    But now Israel has got its genocide on the Houthis are kicking off and saving the environment is no longer anyone’s priority.

    • derf82@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      Israel is guilty for what it’s doing, but blaming Israel for these Houthi attacks is ridiculous.

      The Houthis are self serving in these attacks. As they have claimed land, support has turned against them because it turns out they suck at providing services to the people that live in areas they control. So they are falling back to the one popular policy they have: supporting Palestinians, and fighting back against “imperialists.”

      Except attacking ships in the Red Sea is doing nothing for the Palestinians. Maybe if they only targeted Israeli vessels of ships heading to/from there, but they are not. Even getting bombed has an upside as it reinforces their underdog anti-imperialist messaging.

      • Jojo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        they have claimed land,

        fighting back against “imperialists.”

        Hey, I think I know how they can do that basically for free!

      • livus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        @derf82 I’m not “blaming Israel” for decisions taken by the Houthis. I don’t really get why you’d take that from my comment.

        Israelis made their own decisions.

        Houthis proceeded to make their own decisions about how to respond to that too. I have no doubt that they are pursuing an agenda.

        And the ecology of the Red Sea is no longer a priority for most people in the region because everyone has to make decisions based on what’s happening.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        7 months ago

        All your talking points were debunked more than a month ago in this short interview.

        “To those who claim that we do it for our popularity, let them come forth and enhance their own popularity”

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      The old white man’s burden concept seems to have made a comeback.

      You consider non-white people to be not responsible for their actions because you consider them to be savages that will naturally cause chaos unless under the guidance of the white man. If they are causing chaos it’s somehow the white man’s fault for not guiding them appropriately.

      Personally I think the Houthis are responsible for their actions. Same with Hamas. Same with all the other psychopaths in the region. If you’re going to blame anyone besides these groups for their actions, then maybe consider Iran first.

      • livus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        @SpaceCowboy

        old white man’s burden

        I think you might have replied to the wrong comment?

        If not, I don’t understand how any of this applies. I suggest you read my link about the collaborative efforts in the Red Sea last year.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        You’re right dude. Once Americans are the real victims of the war crimes they commit in the middle east.

        And Genocide Joe is the victimest victim of them all

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Keep repeating your slogans, doesn’t change the fact that Hamas deliberately murdered women and children on October 7, and the Houthis publicly crucify people.

          It’s obvious to anyone outside the bubble you live in how horrific the psychopaths you support really are.

          The Palestinians are the biggest victims of Hamas for sure, but the continued support of Hamas indicates you don’t actually care about Palestinians. You just want to hate Israelis.

        • acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          “GeNoCiDe JoE” is the new Let’s Go Brandon from the same alt-right trolls. I never see you fools criticizing Trump when he literally states he will be a dictator. Know what will happen in the Middle East? Same as now, except American arms and troops will directly be involved.

          • graymess@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Please pay attention this time, it’s getting old: Holding Democrats accountable for their support of genocide is not the same as supporting Republicans.

            • acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              Agreed, but there are plenty people posting that they can’t vote for Biden because of the situation in Gaza. I get the criticism, and I wish we had a more progressive Democrat candidate, but given the reality of our options, not voting for Biden is akin to supporting Trump. In no reality would a Trump presidency be better for Palestinians, or frankly Americans, the West, etc.

              • graymess@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                No, not voting for Biden is not voting for Biden. I’m sure Biden is counting on your argument to get elected, but it’s not going to work. You can’t guilt the left into voting for a genocide supporter. If Biden loses, that’s on Biden and the Democrats. He and the DNC know what they can do if they want votes from anyone left of center.

                • acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Ok, but back in reality with the voting system in the US, that is exactly what happens. If you can’t comprehend how much worse Trump will be, that’s on you. The national election between Trump and Biden (which is who the candidates will be), not voting for Biden is a vote for Trump. Use whatever logic you’d like, but that is what the actual effect is.

              • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                The fact that you don’t have a more progressive Democrat candidate is the DNC’s fault. You can blame the Democrats for that.

                Stop blaming voters for not wanting to vote for Genocide. If Trump wins it’s going to be on the DNC, just like how they screwed over Bernie in 2016 and then Hillary lost to Trump.

                • acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Sure, a Trump win is in the DNC and not the “burn it to the ground” people that are all over the place here on Lemmie, or naive fools. Just remember to keep blaming the DNC when Trump wins and takes away all your rights. That’ll show them.

    • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      7 months ago

      Please note it is not so much Israel as Nyet N’ Yahoo. This is the work of a desperate criminal trying to remain in power.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        And then 72 percent of Israelis say aid shouldn’t be allowed in until prisoners are released.

        I’m sorry. But starving people en masse is not it. It’s time to treat Israel the same way we treated Germany. Disarm, occupy, hang the war criminals, and force a government representative of everyone from the river to the sea. And yes that means an end to their ethnostate. That’s the point. They’ve fucked around. It’s time for the find out.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    The Houthis have been ridiculous about their justifications for attacks, but where was this ship headed? It doesn’t say in the article.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 months ago

    Double disaster. The leaking petroleum is an obvious problem, but the nitrogen in the fertilizer will really fuck some things up too. Wonder if will make a giant dead zone.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    A cargo ship that was struck by a Houthi ballistic missile on Monday has created an 18-mile long oil slick in the Red Sea as it continues to take on water, two US officials said Friday.

    The M/V Rubymar — a Belize-flagged, UK-registered, Lebanese-owned vessel — was carrying 41,000 tons of fertilizer when it was struck on Monday by one of two ballistic missiles fired from Houthi territory in Yemen.

    “The Houthis continue to demonstrate disregard for the regional impact of their indiscriminate attacks, threatening the fishing industry, coastal communities, and imports of food supplies,” US Central Command said.

    One of the US officials said the threat of more Houthi attacks in the Red Sea, combined with the condition of the water, makes it incredibly difficult to safely get to the ship and attempt to tow it to a port.

    The damage sustained by the Rubymar is potentially the most significant to a vessel caused by an attack launched by the Houthis, who have been targeting commercial shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden for months.

    The Houthis’ attacks have been ongoing for months, and despite several rounds of strikes by the US and UK on their capabilities, US officials told CNN it’s unclear how much weaponry the militia group still has.


    The original article contains 606 words, the summary contains 205 words. Saved 66%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Boy I sure am glad that I’ve completely removed 99% of consumerist plastic from my life, never get take out, and heavily reduced my meat intake in order to help the environment.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    America Britain blows up all of Palestine but suddenly they really care about the environment when others try to stop them.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      7 months ago

      America isn’t blowing up Palestine. That is a fascist talking point, to try and shoehorn the US and NATO as the villains into any and every situation.

      • Nudding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        America literally sends billions of dollars in arms and bombs to Israel. Who do you fucking think they use those on?

      • kurwa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        7 months ago

        Where’d the bombs come from? Who fund’s the Israeli military?

    • notsofunnycomment@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Exactly. There is plenty of blame to put on the people who - in the face of a freaking climate crisis - still decide to ship shitloads shiploads of fossil fuel through a warzone.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        America, israel and Britain

        But in this case it’s a American British ship which is why I’m referencing them specifically.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          It isn’t an American ship, the ship has literally nothing to do with America.

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Whoops my bad you are right. Thanks for correcting me.

            I read US central command and was confused thinking this was the Star Iris

            I will correct my comments.

  • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    48
    ·
    7 months ago

    Belize-flagged, UK-registered, Lebanese-owned vessel

    I have zero fucks to give.

    • JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      About who owns or runs the ship? If this is the case i agree, doesnt matter whos ship it is, these dickheads are just polluting the environment for the sake of it.

      • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        55
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        The Houthis are trying to stop moving polluting ships through those waters. Are you blaming the ship or the ones trying to stop the ship?

        This isn’t about pollution or the environment, everyone knows that.

        Trying to shoehorn environmentalism as a justification to keep bombing Yemen is a hilarious mental leap into the abyss.

        Start by asking “the coalition” to clear up the depleted uranium they leave lying around the place in the middle east.

        • squiblet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Your belief is that the Houthis are doing this to stop pollution? I thought it was supposed to be on behalf of Palestinians.

          • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            7 months ago

            I don’t believe that at all.

            I stated that as an absurdist position in comparison to the absurdist position of complaining about an oil slick in a war.

              • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                7 months ago

                You stating what I apparently believe is one of the red flags for someone not engaging in critical thinking.

                I’ve told you I don’t believe that, if you still believe I do you’re trying to construct an argument against the evidence.

                • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I am asking why you think the houthis are shooting the missiles.

                  You said that you don’t believe their stated reason, so I am asking what you believe the reason is, the next question is why you believe that, I am asking your side and for evidence.

                  No side in this is perfect by far, other than the innocents, who by definition have done nothing wrong

                  I don’t see what reason the houthis have to lie about this, what would they have to gain by lying?