Measure allows parent to seek child support up to a year after giving birth to retroactively cover pregnancy expenses

The Republican-led Kentucky senate voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday to grant the right to collect child support for fetuses, advancing a bill that garnered bipartisan support despite nationwide fallout from a controversial Alabama decision also advancing “fetal personhood”.

The measure would allow a parent to seek child support up to a year after giving birth to retroactively cover pregnancy expenses. The legislation – Senate Bill 110 – won senate passage on a 36-2 vote with little discussion to advance to the House. Republicans have supermajorities in both chambers.

  • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’d actually agree if our family court system wasn’t so broken and sexist. But I’m also apart of the unpopular minority that believes that if women can opt out of having kids by having an abortion men should be able to opt out of paying child support.

    Honestly none of this would really be an issue if healthcare was universal like it should be. It’s essentially treating a knife wound with a band-aid

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you could opt out if child support no one would pay. That’s a bad idea.

      • Zoot@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        If you are a man, and don’t want to have a pregnancy, there is no way to “opt out”. Now I agree with you entirely, however I understand where he is coming from as well. As far as I know, the father does not have a say in whether or not a child is born, however you can easily argue that you probably shouldn’t put yourself in that situation if its such a worry.

      • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        You could say the same thing about abortions. If a father wants to be a father, they’ll be a father. If a father has no say in whether or not a woman can abort a baby, they should have a say in whether or not they want to raise it.

    • eatthecake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Sex carries risk and if you willingly ejaculate into a woman then you willingly risk being a father. Use birth control and don’t sleep with pro lifers. You can"t opt out after the fact because you’re not the pregnant one, it’s pretty simple and the men whining about would be better served by demanding better birth control for men than trying to punish women.

      • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Use birth control and don’t sleep with pro lifers.

        No birth control works 100% and women can change their minds about how they feel about abortions, especially when it’s their body.

        you’re not the pregnant one, it’s pretty simple and the men whining about would be better served by demanding better birth control for men than trying to punish women.

        What’s your saying is men should have absolutely no say about a child who carries half of their DNA. We have no say involving abortion, we have little to no say in child support, and we have little to no say with regards to custody. And let’s not pretend that their isn’t a subsection of women who actively use their kids to punish the father. You can’t scream about equality yet want to keep a inherently sexist system that gives the woman ALL the power when it comes to birth and child rearing. I’m pro choice but the idea that a woman gets to completely opt out of raising a child while a man simply has to bare whatever decision she makes with basically no say in it is bullshit.

        It may be your body but it is both of your lives.

        • eatthecake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          You can’t scream about equality yet want to keep a inherently sexist system that gives the woman ALL the power when it comes to birth and child rearing.

          Newsflash: human reproduction is an inherently sexist system that gives women ALL the negative consequences and responsibility of menstruation and pregnancy.

          Men have a say about whether to have sex (barring rape where i don’t beleive men should pay anything) and whether to use contraception. As I said in my comment, better contraception that men are in control of is the solution. You can’t opt out of the consequences of your actions. For women the consequence may be abortion but that is still a consequence. Men would not have this issue if they took responsibilty for their fertility, but instead you want to put it all on the woman and call that fairness. Laughable.

          • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            human reproduction is an inherently sexist system that gives women ALL the negative consequences and responsibility of menstruation and pregnancy.

            Which is why I’m fine with pro choice, but a woman’s choice shouldn’t be the only choice outside of her bodily autonomy.

            better contraception that men are in control of is the solution.

            Which currently doesn’t exist. There are some but besides condoms (which aren’t perfect) male contraception similar to the pill are still in trial phases. You can argue getting a vasectomy but considering the cost of things now getting elective surgery isn’t doable for most.

            You can’t opt out of the consequences of your actions.

            You’re making the exact same arguments as anti-abortionist. Rules for thee not for me. And considering it takes two ppl to make a baby BOTH parties are responsible for their fertility. It’s ewually both parties fault of a pregnancy happens

            I find it laughable that women can completely opt out of raising a child to the point France made it a constitutional right, yet a man has no say (in most cases) at any point from conception to the childs 18th birthday considering both parties are equally responsible. How can you be pro-choice yet make the state force a man to take care of a child they may have openly said did they did not want before the pregnancy?

            • eatthecake@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Ffs, they have a choice to have sex, sex carries risk. Grow up, use a condom and accept the reality that if you take the risk you take the responsibility. Biology isn’t fair and the woman has a choice due entirely to biology.

              • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                10 months ago

                Ffs, they have a choice to have sex, sex carries risk. Grow up, use a condom and accept the reality that if you take the risk you take the responsibility.

                I guarantee this has been said word for word during a protest outside of an abortion clinic.