• fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    Just because Russia has a larger population doesn’t mean they can use it how they want. Ukrainians want to fight and defend their home and families, there’s nothing like that in the Russian military.

    The US could commit some forces to Ukraine without weakening their ability to defend Taiwan.

    I agree that’s the big picture though. Those authoritarian governments, with some support from BRICS and other dictatorships like Venezuela, are challenging the US-Euro hegemony.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      They’ve been doing it for years how they want. Putin doesn’t like when people disagree. I’ve never seen so many people accidentally fall out of windows.

      Until you see units refusing to go to war, my point stands.

      • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        There have been many people refusing to fight for the Kremlin. They have a blocking line that kills their soldiers if they turn around… that’s their level or morale.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          That is Russia being Russia. They did that in ww2.

          Not sure how “historical” everything is but they showed that in enemy at the gates. That really was a shocking scene.

          • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yeah, I feel bad for the young men forced into the trenches.

            We learned from WWII that appeasement doesn’t work, and that democracies need to stand together to defend our freedom.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              We also learned in ww2 that most countries are not thankful for us helping them in their wars. We have a large ocean between us and everyone else. I’m fine letting Europe solve European problems.

              • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                WWII propelled the US to it’s current position as the only real superpower. The US benefited tremendously in some critical ways.

                Also, the bigger of the oceans between the countries didn’t stop Japan from destroying a huge portion of the US Navy. If they weren’t proactive in responding, it could have been much, much worse. Japan could have solidified it’s initial gains and used the territory and resources to grow even stronger, and the Nazis weren’t far from having the bomb.

                Isolationism is a nice ideal in some ways, but it’s not viable anymore.

                • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  The Nazis were far from having the bomb. They talk about this in Oppenheimer.

                  • fuckingkangaroos@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    If they only had to focus on the Easter front they would have had more resources and way more time. If the US sat on its hands it would only be a matter of time until they faced a much stronger Germany armed with nukes.