Do you know any service cheaper than Backblaze?

  • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    S3 compatible? Wasabi is $.99/TB more, but has no egress or API fees whatsoever. So depending on use, it can be cheaper. For archiving purposes, Amazon Deep Glacier is a lot cheaper for storage (but expensive for retrieval).

    Non-S3? Take a look at Hetzner Storage Box.

    • lemmyng@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Note that Wasabi has no egress fees, but has a transfer limit - essentially the contract stipulates that your monthly egress will be less than the amount of storage you pay for.

      • thejevans@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Tarsnap charges you for the compressed, deduplicated storage used, so if you’re mostly backing up documents and working files, the amount of storage used is way lower than the raw uncompressed storage. This includes deduplication at a block level.

        If you use Backblaze B2 with Restic, you can get the same functionality at a much lower price, but requires more setup.

        • flatbield@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Thanks. That is what it seemed like to me. $245 for the software and $5 for the storage per month. Which of course is a bit nuts.

          Block level deduplication does seem interesting. My experience file level dedup is not that effective though of course incrementals are. Compression is not either but easy to do. Lot of document formats are already compressed too. Cross system dedup could be large savings also.

  • flatbield@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    By the way, some of the mentioned services are annual and block pricing. Those plans, the per TB cost depends on where you are in their brackets. Backblaze is pay as you go which is more flexible and you do not pay for more then you use.

  • MangoKangaroo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Are you doing personal file storage, or is this for backups from a server? If it’s the latter case, and if your use case would benefit from deduplication, you could just stay on Backblaze and use something like Duplicacy (available as a free CLI app or paid web UI) to deduplicate and encrypt your files. This is the approach that I use for my homelab. The only issue you run into is that, in the case of Duplicacy, you have to use the CLI or web UI to restore your files (and god help you if you lose your keys).

  • flatbield@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Storj is the other one. No personal experience with it. Also of course Drive e2, and wasabi which others have mentioned. Not sure any of the 4 low cost providers are that different in price though your specific use patterns will matter.

    Personally I have been trying Backblaze B2 recently.

    • chameleon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Storj is blockchain stuff with the storage and bandwidth provided by individual node operators. They’ve kinda tried to bury the whole blockchain stuff and generally keep it removed from their main signup/pricing/usage flow; customers pay in USD and never have to see any of it. But it’s still there in the background and it’s still the main reward system for node operators.

      There’s some clickwrapped T&Cs for operators that set some minimum requirements, they’ve made sure one node leaving doesn’t cause data loss, but I’d still be very wary of using them for anything irreplaceable. It only takes one crypto crash or the like for the whole thing to die out, and while they might end up suing some guys running an old NAS out of their garage, that’s not gonna get your data back.

      • flatbield@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I have the same concern about them. Seems to me that one wants data in a professional and planned data center and based on contractual relationships.

  • flatbield@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The other cheaper way is just 3 USB drives and rotate 1 off site. Should probably do that anyway. If USB is too slow or small then hot mount SATA slots, drives. and drive storage boxes. Presumably SATA drives in hot mount slots are what Backblaze uses anyway.