Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year ago“United in diversity” :3lemmy.mlimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up173arrow-down116
arrow-up157arrow-down1image“United in diversity” :3lemmy.mlTatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squareSaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoYes it is. Of course a cahsier or a car salesperson shouldn’t be forced to appear “neutral” but i think political figured and anything law (judges police etc.) Should always appear as neutral as possible
minus-squareTatar_Nobility@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoThe neutrality of law enforcing authorities is beyond the scope of this discussion, since the court’s ruling concerns private enterprises. By your logic, I hear that you actually disagree with the court’s ruling.
Yes it is. Of course a cahsier or a car salesperson shouldn’t be forced to appear “neutral” but i think political figured and anything law (judges police etc.) Should always appear as neutral as possible
The neutrality of law enforcing authorities is beyond the scope of this discussion, since the court’s ruling concerns private enterprises.
By your logic, I hear that you actually disagree with the court’s ruling.