• D3m0li5h3r@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    9 months ago

    Another thing to note here is this a smokescreen to hide the supreme court’s ruling against the State Bank of India in the Electoral Bonds case.

  • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Before anyone who freaks out without reading the article, no, they’re not removing citizen status for Muslims already in India. They are however making it a lot easier for every religion except Islam to come to India and get nationality

    • festus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s been a while since I’ve read about this but my understanding is that many people in rural areas will lack the documentation showing that they’ve always lived in India and have citizenship. Basically, this would let the government then start questioning people’s citizenship and effectively pretend that many rural Muslims are illegal immigrants while allowing Hindus without documentation to be unaffected.

      • dugmeup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        9 months ago

        Exactly this. Already there is a strategy and accusations of “Bangladeshi immigrants” all over the country. Guess what? How do you prove you are not from there when you are poor as shit, are now allowed to communicate (Police will beat you damn near to death), have no paperwork cause you are poor as shit or had poor illiterate parents?

        Sonny, you eat meat, you are Muslim, believe it or not, straight to jail.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The Indian Ministry of Home Affairs announced the rules Monday, ahead of India’s general election in the spring, when Prime Minister Narendra Modi will seek a rare third term in power.

    Despite being well-received by Modi, a Hindu nationalist, the bill was heavily protested by opposition parties, which claimed it was unconstitutional and marginalized India’s 200-million Muslim population.

    Indian Home Minister Amit Shah praised Modi on Monday evening, saying he “delivered on another commitment and realized the promise of the makers of our constitution to the Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians living in those countries” in a post on X.

    Since Modi’s rise to power nearly a decade ago, critics say the once secular and democratic founding ethos of the world’s largest democracy is crumbling at an alarming speed, with minorities feeling persecuted under the BJP’s majoritarian policies and any criticism of the government facing censorship and punishment.

    It comes a month after two mosques were demolished in Uttarakhand state and Delhi, within days of each other, leading to clashes and local curfews.

    While many Hindus celebrated the opening of the Ram Janmabhoomi Mandir in Ayodhya, the inauguration was a painful reminder to the country’s minority Muslim population of the religious divisions that have grown more pronounced under Modi’s rule.


    The original article contains 369 words, the summary contains 207 words. Saved 44%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    For as broken Pakistan is, this is direct evidence of why its a good thing it exists lol.

    • lledrtx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      How exactly?

      They claim that they are doing this to help non-muslim refugees fleeing places like Pakistan. Their claim is that they can’t accommodate all refugees so the first preference is for non-muslims being persecuted.

      If Pakistan didn’t exist, this persecution wouldn’t be there?

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        There are no refugees fleeing either country, the borders are locked down and heavily militarized.

        The people who do cross the border with visas are very few and only get access via special approval such as if they have family or business due to closeness to the border.

        Pakistan doesn’t even accept refugees as citizens anymore because they don’t ever expect anyone to come from India.

        The joke is that Pakistan’s founders claimed a united India would never last because it would fall to the Hindu majority who would nationilze around their identity and oppress everyone else which is exactly what happend. And not just with Muslims, the Sikh as well who get frequently blamed for public outrage and protests.

        This all happening just gives credit for Pakistan’s purpose because it is a separate country that was created with the intent of avoiding explained problem by being a separate entity and moving all the Muslims there. For its purpose of avoiding being an oppressed minority, it succeded.

        Although I do think they should reopen the border and let the remaining Muslim population in India easily move seeing as they are at the hands of Modi who was already involved in a Massacre not even 2 decades ago.

        • lledrtx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          no refugees

          Not true - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_immigration_to_India

          fall to the Hindu majority who would nationilze around their identity and oppress everyone else which is exactly what happend

          It’s not even close to that. For sure there needs to be big improvements in minority rights but it’s not even close to what Pakistan (and Bangladesh) are. India is heavily flawed but still has a functional democracy and secular state while not a single PM in Pakistan has completed a full term. Lol like they are not even comparable. If anything, India is an achievement of secularism and a good example of why you should separate the church and state.

          just gives credit for Pakistan’s purpose

          Now that is a circular argument because the nationalists say “look at Pakistan and Bangladesh, Muslims got that, why aren’t we getting one?”. So creation of Pakistan is what gives credit to their argument.

          For its purpose of avoiding being an oppressed minority, it succeded.

          Did they? Do Pakistani Muslims lead better life than Indian Muslims?

          • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            It’s a lot close to that. India is fastly moving towards an authoritarian fascist rule. Pakistan has better media index than India & that says something . So no wonder you don’t know what you are talking about. Is persecution of journalists democratic?. India is far worse in minority treatment than Bangladesh and if you feel better comparing yourself to Pakistan, keep doing it. Your points were true before 2014. Almost every Indian knows how much influence bjp has over courts. Just go to reddit and see how many indians want the word secular removed from our constitution. You are straight up living in delusion. Take off your nostalgia glasses and step foot in 2024.

            Do you only count victims if they are Hindu?

            Cow vigilantism

            This incident alone has more minority deaths than in the last 20 years in Bangladesh

            Incident from a few minths ago equals Bangladeshi hindu deaths in 3 years. 2 months ago

            Supreme court

            BBC

            Rapists getting garlanded after release from jail

            Very secular indeed

            Beating a kid for drinking water in a temple. This guy “Narasinghanand Saraswatiis” already released from jail and has been making hate videos constantly without any repercussions. He also has a camp where they teach youth to shoot and fight. Their opponents are 12 year old kids.

            Let’s not forget why your PM is so loved in the first place. 800 is crazy

            All of this is just the tip of the iceberg. Dalits have way worse treatment in India. Where will dalits go when India keeps hate criming them? It’s ironic how India oppresses dalits whether they are hindu/muslim or Christian and some of you act so delusional. India is moving towards an authoritarian fascist rule. The electoral commissioner assignment will make sure of that. I would agree with you if your arguments used “was” when referencing India instead of “is” because it’s no longer the reality.

            • lledrtx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              I don’t know what you are even arguing. My point is India is democratic and secular despite being flawed. Do you not agree with that? If you don’t agree with that, why are you worried about the word “secular” being removed? How does it matter anyway?

              Your incident counting means nothing - India has 1.4B people. Obviously you can find more cases LMAO.

              My point is India is democratic and secular - and that’s an achievement in South Asia (that’s why compared to Pakistan). And that has made it more developed. So democracy and secularism are good ideals to fight for.

              If India is not better off than Pakistan and Bangladesh, might as well let BJP make it non secular like them? Why bother fighting it?

              • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                why are you worried about the word “secular” being removed? How does it matter anyway?

                Yeah you are the type of people I was describing.

                If India is not better off than Pakistan and Bangladesh, might as well let BJP make it non secular like them? Why bother fighting it?

                Never said anything about pakistan, but you are the type of guy to celebrate for getting a participation lol. Also what is this doomer logic. It doesn’t make any sense.

                Your incident counting means nothing - India has 1.4B people. Obviously you can find more cases LMAO.

                Weren’t you describing how much better India is compared to these countries? These numbers are abnormally large and if you think pakistan and bangladesh are not densely populated, I have news for you.

                I’m ending the conversation here. There’s no point arguing with a nationalist that thinks his country has/can do no wrong.

                So democracy and secularism are good ideals to fight for.

                You are doing the opposite rn btw.

      • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        13 lakh hindu immigrants from Bangladesh that aren’t facing any persecution are allowed. Not my words, your supreme leader said it himself.

          • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Are we in 1971? The recent incidents were addressed by police and perpetrators were punished which may sound alien to a lot of Indians. It’s ironic cause India has no right to talk about saving minorities. Lmao.

            • lledrtx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Right, so went from “no persecution” to “police addressed it”. Cool cool. Can you point me to perpetrators of the genocide being punished?