Civilloquy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
GreenEngineering3475@lemmy.world to Movies@lemmy.world · 2 years ago

Millennials, Gen-Z Want Original Movies and TV, Not Remakes — Survey

www.indiewire.com

external-link
message-square
160
fedilink
662
external-link

Millennials, Gen-Z Want Original Movies and TV, Not Remakes — Survey

www.indiewire.com

GreenEngineering3475@lemmy.world to Movies@lemmy.world · 2 years ago
message-square
160
fedilink
Millennials and Gen-Z Want Original Movies and TV, Not Remakes, New Streaming Survey Says
www.indiewire.com
external-link
Nearly three-quarters of respondents to a study commissioned by Tubi said they want "stories that push the boundaries of what's possible."
  • koberulz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    None of the planes shown in the film ever left the ground.

    • CurbsTickle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Unable to delete so editing instead. Leaving Lemmy.world due to privacy concerns.

      • kokopelli@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        The planes look good, but they are almost entirely CGI. The difference is that they used realistic flight maneuvers and reference lighting to make it look really good. Practical effects means little to no CGI and that definitely does not apply here.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          https://www.ign.com/articles/how-top-gun-maverick-astonishing-practical-effects-were-achieved

          That is false.

          • koberulz@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            https://youtu.be/7ttG90raCNo

            No it isn’t.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              2 years ago

              Stop posting youtube. I don’t watch youtube.

              I posted an article that states clearly they flew the planes. Read it and stop posting youtube.

              • koberulz@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Video evidence is far more convincing than someone’s say-so.

                • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  In a comment thread about CGI and VFX, you really want to talk about how accurate the video is?

              • kokopelli@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                Well, if that’s how you win an argument, I don’t read IGN.

                But for those who are curious, in the first posted video he talks about a timeline walkthrough that the editor did. All the jets are CGI covers over F-14s painted grey with lighting markers, except the F-18s. HOWEVER, there were only ever 1 or 2 F-18s in the air, so when you see a squadron of them, the others are CGI.

                So yes, there were some real jets, but that wasn’t the argument you made. You said the film was done practically, which is not true. Even if you have 2/4 jets really in the air, that’s not “practical” and still counts as CGI.

                And I can see where you got this opinion, the news outlets at the time and all interviews spouted “NO CGI!!” Because it is good marketing, but it’s not true.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      That is false. Most of the flying is legit.

      https://www.ign.com/articles/how-top-gun-maverick-astonishing-practical-effects-were-achieved

Movies@lemmy.world

movies@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !movies@lemmy.world

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW’s home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put “(Spoilers)” in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don’t want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don’t support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2 users / day
  • 650 users / week
  • 1.14K users / month
  • 3.86K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 10.9K subscribers
  • 1.87K Posts
  • 12.9K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Tenthrow@lemmy.world
  • JonsJava@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org