return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 10 months agoBernie Sanders unveils 32-hour workweek bill with no loss in pay for workersthehill.comexternal-linkmessage-square212fedilinkarrow-up11.48Karrow-down123
arrow-up11.46Karrow-down1external-linkBernie Sanders unveils 32-hour workweek bill with no loss in pay for workersthehill.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 10 months agomessage-square212fedilink
minus-squareGBU_28@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·edit-210 months agoCompanies already offer part time retail positions, and they are shitty about it. 39.5 hours a week to avoid the full time line. So in this 32h future they’d just offer 31 hour positions at a lower rate and still yank people around Edit: I was off on values. Commenter below pointed out 30 is the mark
minus-squarePatches@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-210 months agoThe Full time Mark is already 30 hours per week measured monthly so not this would not change anything https://www.irs.gov/affordable-care-act/employers/identifying-full-time-employees
minus-squareGBU_28@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·10 months agoSorry off on values, but they would offer part time. This is common. So 28-29 hours.
Companies already offer part time retail positions, and they are shitty about it. 39.5 hours a week to avoid the full time line.
So in this 32h future they’d just offer 31 hour positions at a lower rate and still yank people around
Edit: I was off on values. Commenter below pointed out 30 is the mark
The Full time Mark is already 30 hours per week measured monthly so not this would not change anything
https://www.irs.gov/affordable-care-act/employers/identifying-full-time-employees
Sorry off on values, but they would offer part time. This is common.
So 28-29 hours.