• Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    It doesn’t though. Raising costs by forcing a country to dodge sanctions is very effective. A supply will never entirely dry up, but it will shrink and become more expensive, and that’s enough.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It’s just speeding up dedollarisation at this point. Trade is increasingly done in other currencies because the US dollar is just a minefield of sanctions and regulations. The US had this power back when they produced everything people needed, but nowadays everything’s coming from China, so why involve a third party in your trade that can freeze your accounts for no reason?

    • Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      So far sanctioning Russia and China has mainly just sped up the Global South’s economic integration and China’s becoming self-sufficient. I can see this happening with Iran too since its economy is already somewhat Global South-oriented.

      Though of course, sanctioning less developed countries like Cuba, Venezuela, DPRK, and Afganistan does successfully greatly harm their working-class population, and it has.

      • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sanctions on Russia have crippled their ability to get modern chips for their war machine, so they have to rely on Soviet tech. They hurt Putin personally so much that he went and bought an entire Presidential campaign.

        • Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          so they have to rely on Soviet tech

          Well that part is true enough at least. Capitalist Russia naturally can’t innovate as much as Socialist/Soviet Russia could. Even its highly sophisticated public transport like in Moscow are stuff that the USSR built; they’d probably be filled with high-speed rail by now, like China is, if it wasn’t overthrown.

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Yeah that’s a temp ban for holocaust trivialization if I ever saw one (the person you’re replying to)

        • naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Russia’s economic integration has undoubtedly been with the Global South in recent years. What, exactly, are you disputing from OP’s comment?

        • Alsephina@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          historically

          Lmfao the USSR directly funded and supported emancipatory movements all over the world, like Vietnam, Cuba, Korea, Bangladesh, Palestinian resistance organizations like the PFLP, etc; even directly supplied wars against “israel” for that last one. Afganistan is about the only one where the US and USSR funding opposite sides turned it into a warzone instead.

          Russia’s interests are still broadly aligned with most of the world against Imperial core countries. While they’re not socialist anymore and have thus stopped funding Vietnam, PFLP etc because it’s not profitable for the capitalists that are now in power since the USSR’s overthrow, they continue to support the sovereignty of Global South countries like Syria, Venezuela, etc, and are a core part of BRICS. There’s a reason sentiment like this is common in third world countries.

          And if “Global South” sounds too academic for you… I’m not sure what to say.