Not sure if this was already posted.

The article describes the referenced court case, and the artist’s views and intentions.

Personally, I both loved and hated the idea at first. The more I think about it, the more I find it valuable in some way.

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    2 years ago

    Performance art is wild, often misunderstood. The entire point is to outrage men and he took the bait lol. The artist is clearly getting off on this, staging shit in even more locations because of the lawsuit.

        • redditsuckss@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          2 years ago

          Remember, the only standard is a double-standard when dealing with modern feminists.

          They do not want equality. They do not want equity. They want superiority.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        You’re the artist’s target, and you’re literally performing in her exhibit right now

        • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yep very clever looks like u’ve just discovered the problem with outrage art. If you are successfull it means you are a right old cunt who people hate. It performs far better as mockery of the concept itself than what i think the artist intended. The sueing of them was either a masterpiece 4d chess by the artist themselves or a lesson in irony.

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        49
        ·
        2 years ago

        Men like this always deliberately misunderstand because they are addicted to outrage and misogyny.

        • redditsuckss@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          “Women like this always deliberately misunderstand because they are addicted to outrage and misandry.”

        • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Men like this implying me? God you really are incapable of thinking for yourself. I am not addicted to outragw or misogyny in fact i despise both i very strongly beleive in equallity and cant see how calling objective inequallity what it is is outrage or mysogyny. Please explain how its mysogynous to hate hate ineguallity?

    • redditsuckss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Weird. I can easily see someone doing the same thing but banning women and you wouldn’t say “they took the bait” when women get mad about it.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      When did trolling become a profession? I am not a particularly good artist but I still enjoy making stuff for people and knowing that they are happy with what I make.

    • RedFox@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      I hope the court room shenanigans don’t actually distract from the validity. People tend to get distracted easily from thinking about something challenging.