• credo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    A medication being more expensive usually indicates rarity. This means the instance of required coverage by insurance companies is also rare. The fact any medication, needed to mitigate the risk of simply being born, might not be covered by “insurance” is bonkers.

    I think we need to start a new industry to take it to insurance companies every time they deny coverage. Bury them in complaints and legal actions. Go so hard on every case that they give in immediately upon seeing the letterhead.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think insurance companies are useless parasites that should all have been outmoded by single payer decades ago.

    • ickplant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      8 months ago

      My medicine is $1,500 a month without insurance. It’s a bipolar medication. It doesn’t indicate rarity, it indicates greed. They could easily sell it for half the price and still make money.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s important to keep in mind that this rarity is often artificial scarcity by the pharmaceutical companies. There are some conditions which are rare, but have treatments that have been available for decades now with generics on the market for years. They simply don’t produce much of those meds, even though it’s cheap to do so, in order to artificially inflate the market price.

      Insurers are complicit in this scheme because they don’t push back on this practice at all. Without single payer, we have no negotiating force to get pharmaceuticals to produce drugs in an affordable way, so they can manipulate the market however they please. It’s absolutely depraved.