• This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes, yes US-Israel relations are solely because of Joe Biden. Not like there’s history between those two countries that goes back decades or anything.

        You are very intelligent.

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          40
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I didn’t say that. At all. I don’t like Joe’s handling of the crisis, but I’m not a Biden hater. I’m a keep Trump out of office at any fucking cost voter.

          • capital_sniff@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I think a fair few of these people don’t see the very fine line that Biden is stuck walking. He really doesn’t want to see that lobby money head to Trump’s campaign. And the people pissed at Biden not doing more for the people in Gaza seem to ignore that the alternative is Trump, who will likely just not care.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              6 months ago

              There’s also a significant contingent of pro-Israel Democrats whose votes he needs. He’s walking a tightrope walk. I don’t know that he’s doing it well either, unfortunately.

            • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              6 months ago

              If, say, people had a different candidate to vote for … like Bernie Sanders … then no one would have to bring up the concessions Biden is making to the center-right wingnut crowd … because (1) there wouldn’t be any, and (2) every voter in America would be engaged.

              • rdyoung@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                If, say, Hillary had let someone younger than 30 run her campaign and we didn’t have such a problem with people not understanding what we got because they voted third party, we wouldn’t have had Trump and we wouldn’t be having this conversation.

                Remember that Hillary won the popular vote. The electoral college needs to go away. We also need to do our best to educate people on how to work with what we have and simultaneously work towards making things better while also not letting perfect be the enemy of good.

                I would bet a years earnings that some of these people would starve if left on a deserted island with a lifetime supply of their most hated food.

  • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    6 months ago

    Death for abortions and IVF.

    The latter surprises me since it’s generally affluent white people doing it, and this group definitely wants more of those babies.

    Up next, death for miscarriage.

    Coworkers who don’t have daughters mock me when I say I don’t want my adult daughter living here because it’s dangerous. They think I’m overblowing it. They’re taking the standard, “if it didn’t affect me personally, it’s not real or important,” stance.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 months ago

      One fucked up thing a fertility doctor mentioned to me for embryo disposal seemed to be targeted toward forced birth states wherein the embryo would be transferred to someone who did not have a womb that could carry the embryo to term and would almost certainly miscarry called a compassionate transfer.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      I won’t mock you. I have daughters as well. We live in a solid blue state but out an abundance of caution me and my wife are working on getting them dual citizenship in my wife’s homeland. Still have some more paperwork to go through but it is happening.

      You should always have a backup plan.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    6 months ago

    How do they tell the difference between an abortion and a natural miscarriage?

    I’m joking, they don’t care and are willing to kill the woman either way just to be sure.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      Tell them that the Taliban just brought back stoning. And mandatory full-body coverings for women. Then watch them somehow actively justify their views to void out the cognitive dissonance.

    • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      you mean the citizens there that did not want this too right?

      the disenfranchised voters, the voters whose information on the news and elsewhere is corporate owned

      blaming the citizens for the wrongs of the elites who keep the populace suppressed is how we got here to begin with

      what about the fact that many of the adults who did vote in favor of all this were indoctrinated from birth to be this way

      huge multifaceted issue that voting a religious catholic or a pussy grabber in will not solve

  • RatBin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    Protecting life uh, protecting life my ass. A virus has better chances at respecting life than these things…

  • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    6 months ago

    2024

    Party Against Women’s Rights versus Party Against Women’s Rights

    regardless of which camp you are in both parties are on record saying they are against abortion

    even in one of the comments below a person commented that Biden would not say abortion

    in plain speak on both Wikipedia pages for Biden and the Catholic Church and we all know the Republican’s stance on this

    but both parties are not the same clearly

    one candidate is named Donald and the other’s name is Joe

  • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Roe v. Wade fell during Biden’s presidency and the most he did was an executive order for women’s health research

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/03/18/fact-sheet-president-biden-issues-executive-order-and-announces-new-actions-to-advance-womens-health-research-and-innovation/

    how are you going to advance something that is now not here

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade

    The Catholic Church condemned the ruling by the Supreme Court.[141] Blackmun wrote in his diary, “Abortion flak—3 Cardinals—Vatican—Rochester wires!”[141]

    John Cardinal Krol, the archbishop of Philadelphia who was also the president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and Terence Cardinal Cooke, the archbishop of New York, both issued statements condemning the ruling.[175] Krol called the ruling “an unspeakable tragedy for this nation” that “sets in motion developments which are terrifying to contemplate.”[175] Cooke called the decision a “horrifying action” and added:[175]

    How many millions of children prior to their birth will never live to see the light of today because of the shocking action of the majority of the United States Supreme Court today?[175]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Biden#

    Biden is a moderate Democrat[549] who says his positions are deeply influenced by Catholic social teaching.

    how do the Republicans differ on abortion again?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The president is not a dictator. It doesn’t work like that.

          Also, do you really think presidents should just be able to change the size of SCOTUS whenever they want to? What if Trump gets in and decides to shrink it to only the conservatives?

          • Sybil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            6 months ago

            he can nominate 100 people today and make the Senate turn down every one

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I know enough about our legislature to know that they would not approve 100 SCOTUS justices. I’m not sure why you think they would allow any president to do that unless they were a rubber stamp legislature, which they are not.

      • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        6 months ago

        Wikipedia is now a prime example of misinformation and propaganda?

        of course he would skip over saying that

        he said he is deeply devoted to Catholicism on record right there on his and the Catholic’s Wikipedia page

        how else could one look at those facts?

        • HarkMahlberg@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          These aren’t facts. You’re laundering a broken dog whistle through a couple Wikipedia links. Crawl back into your cave you troglodyte.