I’m looking for a simple sendmail replacement to receive local mail, such as from cron and service failures and forward it to on to a real SMTP server.

I have used msmtpd successfully but thought I’d ask if folks have other solutions they like.

    • markstos@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I found a nice Ansible role for nullmailer, but found that it is not packaged for Fedora, but msmtp and ssmtp are. I think I may try ssmtp next. Despite its unmaintained status, somewhow it’s packaged and nullmailer isn’t.

    • markstos@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Tried that. Yes, it has the feature I need. But it has a rather complex feature set and documentation when I just need to to send my mail to an SMTP server. I ran into problems configuring it for this in the past which were difficult to diagnose due to the volume of config options and docs. That’s what led me to explore tools that had only the features I needed and no more, like msmtp or nullmailer.

    • markstos@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      The one problem with msmtp is that it doesn’t rewrite headers, like “From: root / To: root”. These are not required for SMTP, but they are required by some mail providers who will reject email that doesn’t have an “@” sign in these headers. The author or msmtp has said he does not plan to add this feature.

      I worked around the issue with my own sendmail wrapper that rewrites local addresses in From and To headers before passing the message to msmtp. Someone else posted such a script in this bug report:

      https://github.com/marlam/msmtp/issues/98

      • vegetaaaaaaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        You can definitely replace senders with correct mail addresses for relaying through SMTP servers that expect them (this is what I do):

        # /etc/msmtprc
        account default
        ...
        host smtp.gmail.com
        auto_from on
        auth on
        user myaddress
        password hunter2
        
        # Replace local recipients with addresses in the aliases file
        aliases /etc/aliases
        
        # /etc/aliases
        mailer-daemon: postmaster
        postmaster: root
        nobody: root
        hostmaster: root
        usenet: root
        news: root
        webmaster: root
        www: root
        ftp: root
        abuse: root
        noc: root
        security: root
        root: default
        www-data: root
        default: myaddress@gmail.com
        

        (the only thing I changed from the defaults in the aliases file is adding the last line)

        This makes it so all/most system accounts susceptible to send mail are aliased to root, and root in turn is aliased to my email address (which is the one configured in host/user/password in msmtprc)

        Edit: I think it’s actually the auto_from option which interests you. Check the msmtp manpage

        • markstos@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          In the issue I linked, the msmtp author makes a distinction with changing the envelope recipient, which msmtp can do, with rewriting the email headers like “To”, which msmtp does not do.

  • solrize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Deliverability is hard no matter what software you use. You have to spend a while warming your IP addresses. This is one thing I’d call a hassle to self host. I’ve been using mxroute.com which is diy friendly and cheap.

    • markstos@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m not trying to send mail directly from the host, only forward it to a host that’s prepared to send. I’m using Mailgun for that.

    • Synestine@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I use ssmtp as well for a simple sendmail replacement. It takes over the sendmail command, doesn’t open any ports. You configure it for the domain you want and tell it what server to send everything to and it works.

    • Doubletwist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I use proxmox mail gateway (PMG) for my homelab, configured to relay through my Gmail domain using smtp auth.

      I’ve also used PMG at the enterprise level. Never had an issue with it.

      It’s postfix underneath.

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I run Mailcow-dockerized for my mail server and internal relay, and it’s a postfix based system. Never have any issues with it.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    You want an SMTP relay. You can use a free public SMTP relay, or make one yourself with something like Postfix. If you make one yourself, don’t keep it open, or spammers will abuse it. If you’re sending mail properly, you’ll need to add it to your SPF entry in your DNS. If you’re just sending mail for yourself, you should be able to set up a filter in your email provider so that it doesn’t get rejected.

    You also need to know if outbound traffic is blocked on port 25 by your ISP. Most ISPs block it to prevent spam. If yours is blocked, you can request that they unblock it, but they might not do it. If they don’t, you’re kind of SOL. At that point, you need an account somewhere to send mail through. Then you’d be connecting on port 587 to submit mail.

    • markstos@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I have an SMTP server. I need a sendmail binary that does one thing well: send the message to the SMTP server.

      • hperrin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Can’t you use sendmail? Also, check out my updated message above. You’ll need to make sure you can send outbound traffic on port 25.

        • markstos@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Sendmail is a binary provided by a mail system and no mail system is installed by default on Fedora.

          I’m looking for a solution that’s as simple as possible: provide a sendmail binary to pass the message to a third-party SMTP server.

          I’ll connect to Mailgun via TLS— no port 25 involved.

          • hperrin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Sendmail is provided by the sendmail package in Fedora. Here’s some instructions on installing and configuring it:

            https://tecadmin.net/install-sendmail-on-fedora/

            But you might instead be looking for an SMTP client (or a Mail User Agent), which is different:

            https://www.baeldung.com/linux/send-emails-from-terminal

            If you have SMTP credentials with Mailgun, and you’re using port 465 or 587, you want an MUA, not an MTA (Mail Transfer Agent).

            Sendmail can be both, but there are better tools if you’re looking for an SMTP client.

            • markstos@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Sendmail is a full-blown MTA released 41 years ago that is notoriously difficult to manage. There are reasons that it’s market share has declined from 80% to about 3%. I’m also not looking for a MUA, like mutt. I’m looking for a simple MTA that that only relays outbound mail, like msmtp, ssmtp or nullmailer.

              • hperrin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Again, if you are not using port 25, you don’t need an MTA. Period.

                MTAs are for sending mail from one mail server to another. That’s not what you are doing. You don’t need to be running your own mail server. You are sending mail to an MSA (Mail Submission Agent). Mailgun is the MSA you are submitting to and the MTA that will handle transferring your message to your destination MDA (Mail Delivery Agent).

                If you were submitting mail to your destination server over port 25, you would need an MTA.

                But, as you stated, you are submitting mail to an MSA using port 465 or 587. You need an MUA.

                This terminology is important, because it determines what role the software you’re using plays and how you need to configure it.

                There are plenty of tools that act as both MTAs and/or MUAs depending on how you configure them, because their functionality is very similar. I would guess nearly all tools that can do one can do the other. But if you want to use the right tool the right way, I am telling you, with 100% certainty, you should be looking for an “SMTP client”, “email client”, or “mail user agent” (they mean the same thing). You do not want a relay server, and you do not want an MTA.

                What you probably mean by what you’re asking is something that receives mail addressed locally (acting as an MSA or an MDA), and fowards it (important: this is not the same as relaying, because the destination address is changed) to an MSA (therefore acting as a MUA). If something is forwarding mail like this, instead of relaying, and calling itself an MTA, that is not technically correct. But you probably don’t need that, unless you’re using something that won’t let you configure how/where it sends mail. You just need to set up something that provides a binary that acts as an MUA. Then set up your daemons to send mail to your actual email address using that.

                I’m speaking from experience because I’ve written both an MTA and an MUA, but if you won’t take it from me, take it from Wikipedia:

                An MTA works in the background, while the user usually interacts directly with a mail user agent. One may distinguish initial submission as first passing through an MSA—port 465 (or, for legacy reasons, optionally port 587) is used for communication between an MUA and an MSA, while port 25 is used for communication between MTAs, or from an MSA to an MTA.[5]this distinction is clarified in RFC 8314.

                - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Message_transfer_agent

                • markstos@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I need a sendmail binary that sends outgoing mail to an SMTP server with as few other features as possible.