• WhatsThePoint@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Religion is just a way to try to legitimize hate these days. When you have an indefensible opinion you don’t want to change, say it’s your religion and find an obscure passage to support it. It’s the refuge of the deplorable more than its proclaimed peace and love.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yep, countries like China have plenty of hate and they’re not religious. Take away religion and the hate is still there.

        • WhatsThePoint@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I didn’t say hate didn’t exist outside religion. That would be your cognitive leap. I said religion is used to attempt to legitimize hate as belief so it can be protected from scrutiny on some levels.

        • InformalTrifle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Good people do good things. Bad people do bad things. But for good people to do bad things takes religion. Or something along those lines

      • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I’m no fan of organized religion at all but:

        “None of you has faith until he loves for his brother what he loves for himself.”

        Sounds pretty similarly chill to me.

        The problem is that these texts have so many contradictory statements that they can be used to justify anything anyway.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I mean, he also messed up some temple peddlers pretty bad that one time. I haven’t read enough of the Quran to really know, but I bet it’s also a mixed bag.

        They’re super big on charity, at least.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Inb4 the Russian trolls come here to try and argue this is all Bidens fault and if you vote for him you’re literally as bad as the people actively killing gays.

  • Beaver@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    At least they’re slowing it down. That never would’ve happened under Trump.

  • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    Okay why. What’s the reason to “kill the gays”. This is so unreasonably stupid that it exceeds the bounds of comprehensibility. Even the weirdest takes like “don’t let them marry” or “don’t let them have kids” I can at least see where they’re coming from, I firmly disagree, but I can understand what their take is. But why the actuall fuck do you need to kill them?

    • jwt@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Manbabies with insecurities about their own sexuality is my best guess. Oh, and religion of course, but that goes without saying.

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Projection and self-hate, I can only assume. The Iraqi government must be 100% closeted gays.

  • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    These kinds of “morality” laws always have a built-in slippery slope that entrenches police and judicial corruption, see here:

    the bill would also impose a minimum seven-year prison sentence for “promoting homosexuality,” which is undefined in the bill (…) While consensual gay sex is not explicitly outlawed under current law in Iraq, vague “morality” clauses in the country’s penal code are routinely used to target LGBTQ+ people (…) who said it was necessary to “preserve the entity of the Iraqi society from deviation and calls for ‘paraphilia’ [abnormal sexual impulses] that have invaded the world.”

    First they speak of homosexuality, half an hour later they’re speaking about deviant behavior and paraphilias. What does count as any of those though? Practicing anal or oral sex? Having pornographic material? Wearing jeans as a woman, or letting your hair slightly long as a man? The vagueness is the purpose: by declaring a not very well defined enemy, people in positions of relative power (a policeman, a judge, a local governor) are capable of promoting witch-hunts about anyone who makes a faux pas.

    Ruining the lives of 5-10% of your society’s population is bad enough, but the main purpose of these moves is promoting conformity and entrenching corruption as a means of exerting political power.

  • Wwwbdd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t agree with his Bart-killing policy… but I do approve of his Selma-killing policy

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    They really want to see another “mission accomplished” banner hanging from a US warship huh? Short memories.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah historically the US has been such a staunch supporter of the community