return2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 年前Forcing workers back to the office could be terrible for the environmentwww.motherjones.comexternal-linkmessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up1360arrow-down115
arrow-up1345arrow-down1external-linkForcing workers back to the office could be terrible for the environmentwww.motherjones.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 2 年前message-square55fedilink
minus-squareZaktor@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 年前Yeah, but the CEO personally profits from RTO, while the company profits from reducing their office footprint. Easy choice. He’s not loyal to the company and neither should @CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com be.
minus-squareBuddahriffic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 年前If the company is publically traded, shareholders could sue over that conflict of interest.
Yeah, but the CEO personally profits from RTO, while the company profits from reducing their office footprint. Easy choice. He’s not loyal to the company and neither should @CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com be.
If the company is publically traded, shareholders could sue over that conflict of interest.