• Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m usually against tariffs but in this case it seems like a pretty fair tit for tat to China basically removing the budgetary concerns for their manufacturers that said manufacturer’s international counterparts won’t have.

    Subsidizing local production for local markets is fine enough, but exporting products made with an infinite money glitch active is more or less an intentional play at market capture.

    And before some sinoboo tries to gatcha me I do also object to examples where the west subsidizes domestic production for international markets.

    • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      I want a $10000 car that would normally be inflated to $30000 in the US.

      I’m no lover of China, but fuck the capitalist auto companies.

      • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        That $10k Chinese car cost $20k to make. A competitor undercutting the market that much leads to monopolization. When that competitor is being bankrolled by a foreign government it’s potentially even a hostile act.

        People have been mad for decades about what Walmart did to retail in the US. Taking steps to prevent that from also happening with the auto industry should be appreciated.

      • Novi@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        I was born into a car centric society. So much so they design the places we live around them. Including dense residential far away from employment that requires transportation. Chop all attempts at decent public transit and now you have created a market of completely artificial demand. Which the law says cars must become more expensive. I have to have a car because of the awful design choices made by unqualified politicians past. Fuck the auto industry. They could have been out saviors by being the example of what union companies do but instead chose violence.

        • Lavitz@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          I mean if we’re being capitalists, that’s how the free market works, right?

          • Buttons@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            US auto makers were like “we love the free market”, then people bought cheaper cars from China and they said “wait, not that free!”

            • Lavitz@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              No ethical way to spend in a capitalist society. It kind of is what it is, cause I gotta eat. Also certified “you criticize capitalism yet you live in it moment” to you sir.

              • nymwit@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                are all unethical choices equal? Surely there are better and worse things?

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            My guess that the prior comment either reflects an assumption that non western capitalists are somehow better than western capitalists or that China’s capitalists aren’t a capitalist class.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m against it but I understand it. Every successful country in the last 500 years has subsidized their foreign facing corporations.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      subsidizing production isnt a bad thing.

      it makes for a quicker transition to ev. its only a problem now because china is doing it.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      How moral of you to object to the US government doing the same thing.

      Can I have a means of transportation I can fucking afford now?

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    God forbid anyone get a cheap EV before US car companies sort out which $50,000+ car brand can position itself as the “luxury” one before accepting that they need to build cheaper models.

    • miridius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      The Chinese ones are cheap because they’re being subsidised by the Chinese govt to be sold that cheaply overseas as a deliberate economic attack tho

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Meanwhile the US doesn’t subsidize (or even bail out) its too-big-to-fail auto companies, right? If you consider affordable products a deliberate economic attack, what do you call the extreme price gouging that the American auto companies are carrying out?

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        The Chinese state isn’t selling cars under the cost of construction. The subsidies come in the form of cheap (increasingly nuclear) energy, publicly funded STEM/trade schools, and public health care. These socialized benefits reduce the real cost of living in China and grow the domestic consumer car market, along with lowering the per-unit production costs.

        American car companies have long been hobbled by the obscene cost of employment benefits - high salaries to cover housing costs and student debts, high private insurance premiums, high administration overhead, the constant need to fund stock buybacks in order to keep the value of their stock-incentives up. The deal with the devil they cut with Truman - to make medical insurance a private tax write-off rather than a public good - combined with the enormous Reagan Era tax cuts and rapidly metasticizing private health industry administrative overhead, drives up the cost of each vehicle by thousands of dollars.

        This sucks for the car companies, but is fucking awesome for the FIRE sector. And since 30% of the US GDP is tied up in financing, insurance, and real estate growth, our private automotive industry is effectively forced to subsidize their profits. That’s what makes American cars so expensive relative to their East Asian peers.

    • MadBigote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Chinese vehicles suck. Here in mexico they’re all over the place, and their quality is questionable. MGs are a joke now. Good for the US to block these imports.

      • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m more annoyed that basically every western car company tried to make a $70,000 luxury EV to upscale their brand instead of making a sensible one that people will actually buy. If we want widespread adoption, we need more EVs that aren’t priced based on some pipe dream that people will wake up one day and think Ford is a luxury brand.

        • MadBigote@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The tech for EVs is not quite there yet. Most technologies/services star as a luxury ok this cases where the manufacturing costs are still too high. For example Uber, which started as a luxury service before being widespread with the shitty service they became.

          That’s one of the reasons why I hope my country sets restrictions on these Chinese EVs, as there is not enough infrastructure in Mexico for EVs to even existe, and we can’t produce enough energy for them to be a viable solution for transportation. Heck, I’m even with Toyota and believe EVs are not a tech we should be investing in, and the world will not move to EVs as a widespread mode of transportation. i certainly hope so, because people buying EVs thinking they are the most green solution are not seeing the elephant in the room.

          • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            I mean, we need to stop taking carbon out of the ground and lighting it on fire so it becomes atmospheric carbon. I’m not expecting middle income countries to carry the load but it’s way easier in a rich country like the U.S. or E.U. to switch to electric and switch power generation to renewables or nuclear than it is to (for instance) convince everyone to stop eating beef.

            In no way do I think electric cars by themselves to solve the problem. It’s gotta be a comprehensive strategy. I live in a place that’s prone to hurricanes (New Orleans) and I added solar+batter to my house and got a plugin hybrid. It’s actually better because every few years, a storm knocks out the power grid for a few days and I can still juice up my car an bit and air condition at least one room. So, oil/gas power is unreliable for me when I need it most. But we’re on the front lines, being below sea level, and everyone is going to get there if we keep lighting carbon on fire and making carbon dioxide.

            • MadBigote@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Sure thing, but most people into EVs feel greener while driving EVs, and think that’s all they need to do. A state in Mexico bought electric busses for public transportation and results they charge them with diesel generators, so EVs are now just a gimmick of being environmentally friendly, it’s so dumb.

              I’m all for changing from fossil fuels to renewable energy, but EVs are in no way a factor for the general public to adopt alternative energies. EVs replacing fossil fuel vehicles won’t happen as fast as needed for it to make a change in people’s minds that solar or nuclear are needed.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Bullshit. The EX30 is here and selling for 35,000. The tech is mature, they just don’t want to serve the average consumer.

            • MadBigote@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              What tech are you talking about? I’m talking about the grid not being able to serve everyone switching to EVs anytime soon. Also people don’t factor the batteries needing replacement after some years like any other appliance running on batteries, and those can be quite expensive to replace.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                The car tech. But also, using Mexico’s power infrastructure as a guide to American tariffs on Chinese EVs doesn’t make sense.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        If these Chinese vehicles suck so much, why are US car companies so afraid of them?

        • MadBigote@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Cuz China is well known for subsidizing production (well the US kinda does it too for some productos anyway). I personally wouldn’t buy a Chinese vehicle out of security and quality concerns, regardless of it being Ev or not.

          • hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            If the vehicles are so low quality and dangerous, then it wouldn’t be the job of tariffs but of bans, since there are minimum safety standards that still apply.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        MGs were already a joke though. And if they’re so bad then why do they need to be blocked?

    • 31337@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think part of the problem is that new cars are bought mostly by fairly well-off individuals; with other people buying used cars. Economy cars sell poorly in the U.S.

  • natarey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    Don’t buy shitty Chinese EVs, buy the somehow even shittier American EVs!

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    I was just talking to my dad about this the other day and I told him that it was only a matter of time before the US government goes after Chinese EV’s at the request of the US auto lobby.

    I didn’t think it would be this soon, though. Hurray for more garbage EV’s for $50,000+

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Volvo EX30 compact EV SUV comes out this year with a base price of 35k. I consider that exceptionally reasonable (esp. for a Volvo). I’d buy one myself, but getting my house setup for EVs is a huge can of worms. My electric main is buried, I only have 100a service and my panel is full to the brim.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m frankly getting pretty goddamn annoyed at all the people who relentlessly fail to understand that the PRC is heavily subsidizing production of basically all of their EVs in the interest of undercutting literally all other countries that are (or are trying to) produce EVs.

    By all means, research what I’m saying here to confirm its veracity - in fact I encourage you to. This is economic warfare, plain and simple.

    • czardestructo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Its not just the EV, its every layer of the supply chain. From the lithium they mine, the batteries they make out of it, the circuits and metal fabricating. Their government subsidies the electricity, tools, facilities, labor, etc. I work in the engineering field and I see bits and pieces of this everyday and have seen it for decades because I’m forced to source parts from China.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        I know. I’m trying to dumb it down a bit because the dipshits who argue about this stuff don’t seem to understand the incredible level of complexity of modern-day high tech consumer product manufacturing logistics.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      And what do you think the EV rebates in the US are?

      Fuck the rich. I need a cheap, safe, and reliable vehicle to get to work.

          • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            That is a hilariously myopic and egocentric way of looking at the situation, to the extent that it makes me suspicious that you’re on the conservative spectrum.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          Do you understand that free money on domestic purchases can be used however the corporation pleases? There’s not some magical divide.

          • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Bro. The rebates go to the buyer. They don’t go to the corps. It’s specifically targeted to make it cheaper for US residents to buy EVs in America.

            Edit: actually, more foundational question: do you understand the difference between production subsidy and purchase rebate? And do you understand that the rebate is not applicable outside of the US?

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              So the company doesn’t get the sale price? Why does the customer need the rebate if they haven’t given the company that money in the first place?

              Do you not understand how a purchase works?

              Take your bad faith bullshit somewhere else.

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Allowing a country’s political party to position their industry in a monopolistic way is a bad idea. When one group controls an industry they much more easily exploit their consumers. Encouraging folks to buy ev’s in general is different from undercutting prices to create a dominant position in the market that can be exploited once you have no meaningful competitors

        That being said, we all know thats not why they’re doing it, they’re doing it to protect the interests of US auto makers, which also sucks

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          China is hardly going to be able to under cut the Big 3. Unless they just refuse to come down on their prices. More competition stops monopolistic forces, not the other way around. This narrative has been going around like our auto industry is some mom and pop shop that needs protection from Walmart. In reality they’re the monopolistic force in our market and you can see that by the insane prices they are charging.

    • sebinspace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      EVE Online taught me this lesson. Those with the resources to do so will take a loss to price you out of the market, because they know you can’t take the losses nearly as long as they can.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        And that’s precisely what’s happening here. A car manufacturer with a whole-ass government subsidizing it is going to be able to operate just fine at a loss pretty much indefinitely, whereas a normal car manufacturer would sooner or later simply go bankrupt (pointedly ignoring the whole “too big to fail” idiocy, which to be honest, while similar, isn’t quite the same thing).

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        This isn’t a mom and pop shop. This is the Big 3 in the country with a GDP 10 trillion dollars higher.

        Stop spreading red panic, it’s not the 1950’s.

  • thezeesystem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    Isn’t this just a ban on Chinese evs? Just with extra steps? Make it impossible financially to sell it in the US pretty much is a ban without saying it’s a ban

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Although the BYDs and GWMs and MGs are getting popular in Australia, I have literally never seen a Chinese EV in the States outside of locally built BYD busses, and BYD cars have distinct designs that are fairly easy to spot. So this feels like posturing to me.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I have literally never seen a Chinese EV in the States outside of locally built BYD busses, and BYD cars have distinct designs that are fairly easy to spot. So this feels like posturing to me.

      The Chinese business strategy has been to target East Asian, Indian, Russian, and West African car markets. They’re not trying to compete with US cars in the United States. They’re displacing US export markets in the Third World. You might be able to find them south of the border, however. In the first five months of 2023, Chinese exports to Latin America reached over 330,000 vehicles with a special focus on Mexico and Chile.

      Meanwhile, the US has had a long and storied tradition of open hostility to foreign car manufacturers. Consequently ten different car manufacturers have plants in the United States.

      These taxation and regulatory provisions are shockingly similar to the Chinese rules that guys like Biden and Trump deride as anti-competitive. And given the quality of US vehicles has long been sketchy at best, with a continued reliance on ICE engines in a market that increasingly favors the cheaper and more reliable electric vehicles, its questionable how long the Big Three domestic brands can even survive.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The government will make sure they survive. They’re to big to be allowed to fail.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Hard to function at the multi-national scale if you constantly need bailouts.

              And there are plenty of Republicans who would love to see Detroit Go Bankrupt.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                I think they want the UAW gone. But GM and Ford give them too much money for them to get rid of the companies.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      They’ve been getting ready to ship to the US for a while. The EX30 arrived this year and is getting pretty good reception. It’s 35,000 and the best rated EV SUV at it’s price point. It’s 7 overall behind vehicles 20,000 more expensive.

  • JovialSodium@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I wonder how repairable and maintainable these will be as compared to EV’s from other markets and if replacement batteries will be available as the original ones reach the end of their useful life.

    If these concerns end up being valid, and the tariffs are large enough that these cars aren’t priced particularly competitively, that’d be enough for this EV consumer to pass it up for his next vehicle. Will be interested to see how it plays out.

    Edit: Wanted to say I’m not against Chinese EV’s. If it ends up making sense to get one, I will.

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, after-sales support would be my main concern as well. How support, maintenance, repairs, and warranty claims work.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Presumably the manufacturers of these things would have to set up a dealer network in the US of some sort in order to be competitive at all. Otherwise, these will be completely dead in the water with US buyers. Plastic crap from Temu and AliExpress is one thing, but I can tell you nobody will buy something as expensive as a car knowing it’s completely unsupported.

        Historically, importing Chinese vehicles has been a totally buyer-beware operation. You might get a short replacement parts only warranty from whoever the importer is if you’re very lucky. Otherwise, you’re on your own. Both finding the parts and doing the labor. I say this as an owner of three (3) Chinese motorcycles which have been fine enough machines for what they are, but never mind a warranty – no mechanic’s shop will touch them even if you’re willing to pay. So I do my own work on them.

        But cheap motorcycles are way less complex than a full sized electric car.

        • Num10ck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          in order to legally sell new cars in the US you have to supply replacement parts for a decade, last I heard.

          • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yes but like OP said the labor is the problem. You have to have shops willing to work on them unless you’re willing and ready to work on them yourself.

          • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            Parts, sure. So, after a 3 month shipping wait from China you get a replacement battery or drive unit dropped at the end of your driveway on a pallet. Now what?

            I don’t think any buyers other than maybe the guy who runs the Aging Wheels channel are going to be willing to take apart their own Chinese EV and do major repairs to it. If no one works on it, or if they open a perfunctory couple of service centers that are all conveniently thousands of miles away from where you live, that’s not going to do you much good.

    • edric@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      6 months ago

      I was too, until I found out they completely removed the driver instrument cluster, so even the speedometer is on the infotainment screen. I’m all for large screens, but the speedo and other necessary gauges should still be in front of the driver or on a HUD.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        100% agree. They really stripped that car down in order to make it work with a 27% import tax from China. Few physical buttons, a soundbar instead of door speakers, etc. There are a number of quirky design

        Android Automotive (not to be confused with Android Auto) is the only thing that makes me think I could make it work. More specifically, Google Assistant control for HVAC, defrost, etc.

        One of the things that drives me nuts about Telsa is that the buttons are missing, and the voice control is shit in comparison to Assistant and even janky ’ol Siri.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          To be fair soundbars are pretty awesome these days. Maybe not for an audiophile but they’re beyond “good enough” for regular people.

          • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yeah, reviewers seem to like the sound bar and think it sounds better than what Volvo Polestar have done in the past.

            Seems like a solution that other manufacturers should adopt. It can bring the sticker price down and can sound better in many use cases. Although it might come at the expense of diminished audio for rear passenger.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        There’s a car out now that uses an actual glass HUD. I’d go for that. Give me the name of the band playing, my speed, and my next turn right in front of me instead of to the side.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        It gets worse. Not only did they remove the the cluster and shifted everything to the infotainment a-la Tesla, but their system for detecting if you’re looking at the road (for alertness/safety reasons) immediately starts screaming at you when you glance over at the speedometer on your infotainment screen. Who tf designed that system?