• prayer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    The idea that we cannot have real change without some for of revolution, so we should make things go to their extreme, and cause some kind of cultural revolution.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I see. I understand that as a path, but that seems like the “option of last resort” to me, and these guys want to make it the proposed one?

      • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Fake communists. Hexbears. It’s just Anarchy, but the “fuck everything” type of anarchy.

        I understand the frustration and desire to burn everything down, but I just think that’s lazy and won’t end up working at all.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Those are just nihilist. Actual anarchist generally aren’t the fuck shit up kind. Those are generally angsty young teens with very little understanding.

          You are however 100% right about lemmy.ml. hexbear and Lemmygrad. They are all Marxist leninist. Which was an ill-conceived transitory authoritarian style anti communist government that was supposed to facilitate the build up to and transition to communism. But not communist itself. Which has failed everywhere it’s ever been tried. Much like capitalism if you go by it’s stated goals and ideals.

          They love to blather on and on and on about communism and how great and wonderful it would be. And it would be. But everything they do is actually in opposition to it so they are very much fake/ performatory communists.

          • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            To be politely pedantic, while I agree generally, in the defense of nihilists, not all of them want to actively burn it down. They just don’t care and nothing matters. It’s the unique combination of anger and anti-establishment that makes the type of person we are talking about. And if they care enough to burn it down, I’d argue they can’t be a nihilist by definition.

            • Eldritch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              4 months ago

              That’s absolutely a fair assessment. My biggest issue was the way anarchism is most commonly misrepresented and used. Of which I absolutely used to be one of those people. So it’s not a dig at anyone in particular. Just trying to help us be a little more accurate in things. But you’re absolutely correct to point out that that isn’t all nihilists either.

              • TherouxSonfeir@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                There is a lot of misunderstanding about anarchism in general for sure. Much like the term “Liberal,” as every so-called-communist likes to point out to me. Political ideologies are ridiculous in general, as no one actually agrees 100% with any single idea. Why we can’t all agree to stop hating each other, I dunno haha.

    • Gigasser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      No, it’s people who think accelerating the country into a hyper capitalist fascist hellhole will lead to the accelerated collapse of the capitalist system. Then revolution will bring the promised land to them. Of course they don’t realize that collapse isn’t necessarily guaranteed.