• jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The article was written by someone that doesn’t know what NATO is for. For all its problems NATO has excelled at doing what it was made to do, which is keeping Russia out of its members territories. Contrary to Russian propaganda NATO is not supposed to be the be-all and end-all of Western power projection - in fact there is no such organization.

    • trajekolus@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      The point is that to protect the Nato countries in Europe, Nato should have, and could have done a lot more to defeat Russia’s imperialist aims before it reaches the Nato countries doorstep

      • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        Again, NATO’s only purposes are to defend its member countries if any of them gets directly attacked or very exceptionally to enforce UN Security Council Resolutions. That narrow scope creates some issues but it’s also a big factor in avoiding a nuclear war.

        Pretending that NATO is or should be more than that is only helping Putin.

      • magnetosphere@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s up to individual countries to make that decision - and I think everyone should be defending Ukraine more aggressively. I agree with a lot of what the author is saying, but he doesn’t seem to understand what NATO is for. NATO is not a police force meant to defend all of Europe.