Emails shared with CNN by the Texas Department of Public Safety detail a trooper-medic expressing concerns to a supervisor over the inhumane treatment of migrants along the border in Eagle Pass, Texas.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Someone noticed that Christianity and right-wing doctrine aren’t nearly as compatible as the right-wing wants them to think …

    • DigDoug@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s an episode of Behind the Bastards called “How the Rich Ate Christianity” about how certain people essentially constructed the religious right. In the early 20th century, the majority of pastors were socialists.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Religion is always conservative, that’s why Russian Communists destroyed churches and killed clerics.

        • DigDoug@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Religion is always socially conservative. Fiscal conservatism doesn’t tend to jive with the teachings of most religions.

          The fact that they tend to vote conservative anyway may show where their priorities lie, but I wasn’t lying when I said that most pastors were socialists in the early 20th century - it should be a natural consequence of believing in the teachings of Jesus.

        • novibe@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Socialism is a direct consequence of Christianity. It’s the ultimate material incarnation of it.

          Because of Christianity, we had the Renaissance, because of the Renaissance, we had capitalism. Because of capitalism we have socialism.

          And many religions are extremely progressive and egalitarian. Many Hindu, Buddhist, Christian, Jewish and even Muslim sects are. Not to mention Sikhs and Jains etc.

          The issue is mostly the hierarchical, patriarchal and authoritarian sects won out and dominated the rest, extinguishing most that were real threats to their domination.

          In my mind, this is all religion by the way. Buddhism or capitalism. Trans-humanism or nihilism. It’s all religion. We just have a very limited and antagonistic view of religions nowadays.

          To the Classical Greeks “religion” was just trying to understand the world and how to live in it for example. That’s how most of us saw religion for a long time. Until the Catholic Church basically.

          Now the Catholic Church is evil as fuck… mostly. As an institution.

            • novibe@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Religion and mythology have nothing to do with one another.

              One of the oldest religions in the world, Advaita Vedanta, has basically no mythology. And I’d say it says a lot of similar things to modern science.

              If you think ancient peoples believed the things they wrote in the way you understand them literally, then you really are missing the point.

              We’ve been hammering on the same thing over and over. We’ve found the answer many times.

              Science perhaps will be the gateway for this truth for a massive number of people. Much more than ever before.

              But still, we’ve found the answer many many times already.

              • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Religion and mythology have nothing to do with one another. Advaita Vedanta, has basically no mythology

                What’s your definition of religion then? I think it probably maps to my definition of ‘culture’.

                • novibe@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Religions have always been about trying to understand the world and how we should act in it as human beings. Those are the only and main things that connect all different “religions” in time and space.

                  • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Ok, so in trying to understand the world, there are really two options. Things you have proven (science), and things you believe without having proven. I’d argue that this second one is mythology.

          • Aux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lolwut? ALL religions are highly conservative and oppressive, that’s the point of their existence. There would be no need for renaissance if there was no religion.

            • novibe@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              How are all religions conservative and oppressive? How is that the point of their existence?

              Like have you ever read anything about early Christianity compared to how things were around it at the time? What about Mandeism? What about the early Hindu schools like Advaita Vedanta and Vaisheshika? What about Sikhism, which is explicitly egalitarian and humanist?

              The Renaissance was just a stage of development of Christian values. Like Capitalism after it (which was an evolution of Protestant values) and socialism.

              Arguably modern science was born in the Catholic Church.

              Why do people speak so confidently about things they know so little about?