• cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    Its not even for paying her. Its for paying her to nok speak. People are ok with him paying for whatever sexual fantasy or lust he may have had. But not ok with him paging her to not tell

    • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It’s not for either of those things. It’s for cooking the books to hide the transaction. Falsifying financial records is the crime. And it would be a misdemeanor except that it was done to further a conspiracy to defraud the public which makes it a felony. It’s not a crime to drive, but it is if it’s a getaway car.

      • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        so it wouldn’t have been a crime if he had just paid her to not tell, in order to protect his presidential candidacy? The actual crime was that he tried to hide that he had paid her not to tell?

        • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          He committed a criminal act to hide the source of the funds. He could have just paid her out of pocket and not told anyone. No crime then.