• BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    At no point did the article dispute that the man knew his license was suspended and that he therefore knew he was driving on a suspended license. Hell, his case was about him having done this before.

    Don’t video call into your driving on a suspended license court case while driving on a suspended license.

    • Bell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      Are you defending the botched legal process and suggesting that it deserves more respect than the man who is in fact in the right? That we should continue to obey even when it’s wrong?

      The man also knew that his license was not in fact suspended in any legitimate way. If I was the victim of failed bureaucracy for months I would ignore it too.

      • cdf12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Ignore it sure, but maybe not as you zoom into a court appearance

      • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It is the easiest thing in the world to not actively be driving while video calling in to a court hearing, regardless of what the hearing is for. He could even physically be in the car sitting in the passenger seat with it parked and be fine, but why take the risk? Especially when the consequence is jail.

      • Llewellyn@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        He was videocalling while driving. It’s a shit and dangerous behaviour on its own.