lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-21 year agoIt's easier to remember the IPs of good DNSes, too.lemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1320arrow-down150file-text
arrow-up1270arrow-down1imageIt's easier to remember the IPs of good DNSes, too.lemmy.sdf.orglambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square83fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 year agoOk, now I’m fully proposing a new standard, called IPv16! (Keeping with the tradition to jump over numbers.) Also, it will be fully backwards compatible for a change! That solves the largest complaint from the holdouts!
minus-squareZink@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoOh nice. Does your system FINALLY provide enough addreses for every Planck volume in the observable universe? It’s been frickin amateur hour, this internet thing.
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoNo, sorry. It’s backwards compatible on address length too.
minus-squareChadus_Maximus@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year agoTBH 4 billion IP addresses is way too many. We should reduce that to 33 million for convenience.
Ok, now I’m fully proposing a new standard, called IPv16! (Keeping with the tradition to jump over numbers.)
Also, it will be fully backwards compatible for a change! That solves the largest complaint from the holdouts!
Oh nice. Does your system FINALLY provide enough addreses for every Planck volume in the observable universe? It’s been frickin amateur hour, this internet thing.
No, sorry. It’s backwards compatible on address length too.
TBH 4 billion IP addresses is way too many. We should reduce that to 33 million for convenience.