lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-21 年前It's easier to remember the IPs of good DNSes, too.lemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1320arrow-down150file-text
arrow-up1270arrow-down1imageIt's easier to remember the IPs of good DNSes, too.lemmy.sdf.orglambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-21 年前message-square83fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 年前Ok, now I’m fully proposing a new standard, called IPv16! (Keeping with the tradition to jump over numbers.) Also, it will be fully backwards compatible for a change! That solves the largest complaint from the holdouts!
minus-squareZink@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 年前Oh nice. Does your system FINALLY provide enough addreses for every Planck volume in the observable universe? It’s been frickin amateur hour, this internet thing.
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 年前No, sorry. It’s backwards compatible on address length too.
minus-squareChadus_Maximus@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 年前TBH 4 billion IP addresses is way too many. We should reduce that to 33 million for convenience.
Ok, now I’m fully proposing a new standard, called IPv16! (Keeping with the tradition to jump over numbers.)
Also, it will be fully backwards compatible for a change! That solves the largest complaint from the holdouts!
Oh nice. Does your system FINALLY provide enough addreses for every Planck volume in the observable universe? It’s been frickin amateur hour, this internet thing.
No, sorry. It’s backwards compatible on address length too.
TBH 4 billion IP addresses is way too many. We should reduce that to 33 million for convenience.