REP. JAMAAL BOWMAN’S Tuesday upset defeat by Westchester County Executive George Latimer generated many perspectives on what exactly precipitated his downfall.

The New York Times published the headline “Bowman Falls in House Primary, Overtaken by Flood of Pro-Israel Money” — before swapping it out for “Bowman Falls to Latimer in a Loss for Progressive Democrats.” Other coverage emphasized that the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s spending wasn’t the only factor in the race and that Bowman’s flaws made him particularly vulnerable, as did changed district lines that made his reelection even tougher.

Progressive strategists, however, had a much more clear takeaway from the results.

“You don’t drop $15 million on an election if your positions are popular,” said Eva Borgwardt⁩, national spokesperson for the Jewish advocacy group IfNotNow, which endorsed Bowman. “This was an act of desperation from a pro-war lobby that is at odds with the majority of Americans, including American Jews.”

Borgwardt⁩ was referring to nearly $15 million spent on the race by AIPAC, the Israel lobby’s flagship in the U.S. Millions more poured in from AIPAC-aligned groups and donors, bringing the outside spending total to around $25 million.

  • NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    5 months ago

    Garbage…AIPAC isn’t what beat him. His own mouth did. He was losing by10 points before AIPAC was even involved

    • RandomWalker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      Latimer wasn’t even in the race when AIPAC got involved. They reached out to him before he even announced his candidacy. It’s possible he could’ve won without their help, but don’t make up imaginary poll numbers to try to bolster your argument.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      And yet they felt it was necessary to spend $15 million on a primary that he was winning by 10 points. Sure, buddy.

        • SeaJ@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t think you understand what a fact is, ‘bud.’ I think there are quite a few basic things that you do not understand.