• Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I know homophobes that are atheists. while religion being gone would decrease it, do not expect it to be gone just because of that. People will always have issues with people different than they are.

      • CaptnNMorgan@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        There are smart homophobes. They use science, however flawed it is, to promote their arguments. Cutting out religion would take care of the few vocal people who genuinely believe being gay is against their religion but it definitely wouldn’t take care of the larger problem which has always been xenophobia.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          No one is going to vote for science, give me a break. You don’t drive people to the polls based on a study or a syllogism, you get people to vote for you based on FUD. Fear, uncertainty, and doubt.

          Religion is freaken awesome at this.

    • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      yes, but with religion out of the way, we can implement better education to reduce ‘otherism’ bias. i am convinced that the only obstacles stopping us from being better humans are all rooted in BS fairy tales.

      • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        You can be convinced, you will be wrong though. Religion is a means of justifying otherism, not the origin of it. People will just create another bunch of bullshit to justify why they aren’t bad people.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            So maybe the issue isn’t religion or the absence there of, but that shitty people will find excuses to justify their shittyness. That would make focusing on religion a waste of time.

                • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  laws based on what? what kind of education? how do we achieve reasonable laws and enforcement?

                  my point is that we both advocate for humanity. the path is see towards that is a secular one. most of the obstacles to what we want are based in religion.

                  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    The obstacle I’m seeing is the police not doing their job. They’ve already talked to one of the assailants, they know who they are, and have done nothing. Let’s start there.

        • sparkle@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          Cymraeg
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Lol what? You are delusional. I’m not sure Orthodox Slavs would agree that WW1 and the subsequent Russian Civil War were “secular” wars considering most propoganda from that time was highly religious and they were seen as “holy wars” by both Slavs and Germans. The Ottomans literally were a Sharia state and the Sultan framed the war as a Jihad against the enemies of Islam. There was deep religious subtext in WW1 from nearly all the major European powers.

          Both world wars were caused mostly by nationalism/ethnic conflict and recent history/economic problems. Secularism had literally not a single thing to do with it. Where exactly do you get this “WW1 and WW2 were caused by secularism” delusion from?