• finley@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Clear? No. Interviews are edited all the time.

        It highly depends on exactly what was edited and how. And that’s not clear at all.

        • ralphio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          The problem is that they did it at the request of the interviewee. Clearly they see it as a problem.

          With a high-profile interview comes a listener expectation that journalistic interview standards will be applied … We did not meet those expectations

          • finley@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            No, that’s not a problem. The problem is implying malfeasance without any evidence.

            That’s slander/libel.

            Weren’t you just criticizing someone for their supposed lack of journalistic ethics? Don’t you see the clear hypocrisy in that?

              • finley@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                I said “slander/libel” to avoid confusion, not because I didn’t know the difference. But thanks for the clarification. 👍

            • ralphio@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              4 months ago

              Seems like they admitted malfeasance in the statement I copied. Also an online comment doesn’t constitute journalism so I think I’m in the clear there.

              • finley@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Seems like they admitted malfeasance

                No, they didn’t. They admitted to doing what commonly happens with interviews and commented that most people simply don’t expect it. They didn’t admit malfeasance. YOU made that accusation, again, without evidence.

                Also an online comment doesn’t constitute journalism so I think I’m in the clear there.

                But claiming something that didn’t happen, without evidence - as you keep doing - while accusing another of the same thing is certainly both unethical and hypocritical.

                And I certainly didn’t accuse you of journalism. I accused you of slander/libel.

      • Blanksy@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        4 months ago

        Here come the downvotes. If it were Trump it would be front page news already, lol. And now everyone wants to act like this is normal

        • finley@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          It frequently happened and happens with Trump. And nobody cares.

    • Blanksy@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      4 months ago

      So what? That’s wrong on so many levels and it’s just more proof of the collusion thats been happening between the Dems and the MSM

      • finley@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        How is it wrong to do what’s commonly done in most interviews for a variety of reasons? And how does that make “Dems” or “the MSM” different on this case than in every other case where it’s very commonly done?