company?

I mean how did it work?

  • Alex@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The phrase “no loose lottery” should be a red flag right away.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Normally, yes, but Yotta looks like a form of “Prize-based savings”

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prize-linked_savings_account

      They are “no lose lottery” in the sense that you don’t put up money directly to enter, you just open a “savings account”. But they pay far less than market rate to fund the payouts. So in a sense, you pay for the entry with reduced returns on your “savings”.

      • Alex@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        So similar to premium bonds? Usually those are government backed though.

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes, similar to government-backed premium bonds, in the countries where they do stuff like that. But they are not run by the government, so they need to be called something else.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    It seems like the big problem with Yotta right now is that it is caught up in the Synapse fallout. These small financial firms advertised that their customers funds were insured, but didn’t hold them directly, they held them through intermediaries like Synapse who did have the US FDIC insurance. When Synapse collapsed, all the funds held by Synapse’s customers like Yotta got stuck in limbo.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/02/synapse-fintech-fdic-false-promise.html