• lad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Anything that is drop-in replacement for C (or C++ for that matter) is going to be awful because of the same compatibility burden, imo

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Apparently, I do not RC. I might have been thinking of Nim. A quick search indicates it’s not memory-safe, though. It has a few helpful features to keep errors under control, but that’s it.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I was planning to check it out, but don’t have any experience yet. I thought it is more of a replacement than drop-in replacement, I may have been wrong

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      D is a mostly drop-in replacement (type renaming and such needed though), and it doesn’t have that issue. D even has a mode called BetterC, where the D standard library and the garbage collector is left out.