In her first interview as the Democratic presidential nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris told CNN it was imperative to reach a ceasefire deal in Gaza, but made it clear that she would not alter President Joe Biden’s policy in the region.

However, when pressed on whether she would stop sending weapons to Israel she told Bash, “No, we have to get a deal done, Dana. We have to get a deal done.”

“Adopting an arms embargo against Israel’s assault on Gaza is not only a moral imperative but also a strategic move to defeat Trump and MAGA extremism. It is difficult for the Democratic candidate to champion democracy while arming Netanyahu’s authoritarian regime” reads a recent letter to Harris from the coalition Not Another Bomb.

Recent polling has repeatedly demonstrated that Democratic voters overwhelmingly support the conditioning of U.S. military aid. A Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) survey from March found that 52% of Americans want the U.S. to halt weapons shipments to Israel in order to force a ceasefire. 62% of Biden voters said “The US should stop weapons shipments to Israel until Israel discontinues its attacks on the people of Gaza,” while only 14% disagreed with the statement.

The numbers from a June CBS News poll were even higher, with more than 60% of all voters and almost 80% of Democrats saying the U.S. shouldn’t send Israel weapons.

“The real question should have been, ‘When are you going to start enforcing U.S. law as it relates to arms shipments’ because what we are doing right now, with this United States policy, is in violation of not just international law, but also of American law, “said the Arab Center’s Yousef Munayyer in an interview with Democracy Now in response to the CNN segment. “Vice-President Harris made it clear in other parts of her interview that she wants to be a prosecutor. She wants to enforce the law, but Israel is clearly getting an exception from the Harris campaign.”

  • Jamil@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    19 days ago

    80% of her base wants to stop sending weapons to Israel. Where the fuck is democracy?

    • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Yeah. I suspect many of us knew her stance on this issue before she said it but she really did not need to say it.

      I appreciate the honesty but I do wish that she would avoid this one topic in particular. This is an issue that younger voters feel very strongly about. Younger voter turnout may not be good anyways, but I would really do my best to avoid upsetting that crowd. We’re not trying to make people go back to feeling apathetic regarding the election again.

      • antmzo220@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        I think it’s good she can’t stop saying it. The voters deserve to know that she supports the genocide and to decide for themselves if her support for said genocide of Palestinians is worth whatever other comforts she provides the voter as a group.

        It’s right for people to feel strongly about support for a genocide so the focus shouldn’t be on not “upsetting that crowd” by lying, but on either not engaging in genocide (she’s eliminated this option) or on convincing them that supporting a genocide is worth what else she has to offer.

        (Inb4 whataboutism over Trump, yes he sucks too and is also genocidal, that doesn’t make Harris not pro-genocide and I never said to vote for Trump.)

    • suction@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      Right because Trump will nuke Israel and single-handedly create a Palestinian state from the mountains to the sea. So definitely vote for him.

      • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        I don’t know if you’ve noticed but the last 10 months have taken place under the Biden administration.

        Edit: also nobody wants that wtf are you talking about

      • K1nsey6@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 days ago

        Biden/Harris Is providing enough money and weapons for Netanyahu to finish the job. While shitlibs are terrified of what Trump MIGHT do, they are distracted from whats actually happening

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      What? Trump advocates to completely glass Palestine. Biden position is to not block Israel from purchasing weapons, but also not getting dragged into a war itself and in fact getting out of Middle East. This is the real reason why West pushes so hard for EVs. US wants completely out, and if Israel wants to fight then let them use their own resources. Bibi would love if US instead of providing weapons would enter and do the job for them.

  • Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    18 days ago

    God they’re so stupid.

    Israel will not stop until we take away their ability to continue.

    When this war ends, Netanyahu will be removed from power for his prior crimes and likely jailed. He doesn’t want that and he’s murdering Palestinians to be sure he never sees the inside of a cell.

    I wish we had an actual viable option for ending this war. But my choices right now are vote for the genocide or flee the country because Trump has promised he will make my wife’s life hell day one.

  • Bertuccio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    I didn’t expect this at all and am deeply hurt.

    I really thought the handpicked second most powerful person in the country would differ significantly in policies from the people who handpicked her.

    • yeather@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      19 days ago

      My god what an apt description for American polititcs. (Illegal) Aliens vs. (Sexual) Predators.

      • Crikeste@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        Illegal ‘aliens’ are NOWHERE close to sexual predators by nature.

        Hell, by nature, illegal immigrants are more civil and respectable than ANY ‘natural born American’. Every metric and statistic will show you that.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      At least during this period of anger we won’t have to also deal with the gnawing realization that they’re 100% going to lose. Harris may still lose, and this could certainly help her along the way, but it’s not a certainty, which is kind of better?

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      19 days ago

      Checkout Trump’s history of making his “close personal friend” Bibi happy if you want to be even more angry.

      • antmzo220@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Many people (like myself) are simply incapable of getting any more angry at Trump.

        They know he’s an irredeemable monster and not the standard politicians should be held to.

        It’s when other “reasonable” politicians fail to seperate themselves from him or clear that bar and normalize his ideas/policies that we continue to get upset.

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Why?

    Seriously! Why!?

    I don’t remotely understand this policy, and it seems that pretty much noone would vote for it if they could avoid doing so.

  • pocopene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    As a European citizen: is it really a possibility for any US president not to do so? (Honest question, since from Europe US’s policy is seen as supporting Israel no matter what)

    • doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      Other presidents were able to restrain Israel from trying to enact a “final solution”

  • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    19 days ago

    I don’t really understand what weapons our government is sending Isreal. Is it that we just aren’t canceling their contracts with our weapons manufacturers? Or we arent banning exports of weapons?

    Our government doesn’t actually make weapons, we give contracts to companies to make them and have limits on who else can buy. Isreal doesn’t need our hand-me-downs.

      • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        Thank you! That was an informative article. It’s like we are giving them Raytheon gift cards every year. This makes sense, as it’s the military industrial complex doing what it do. More blood for the blood gods, etc.

        What I think is interesting from the break down is how they are supposed only use it for defense, but then when we go “hey I don’t think you are using that for defense!” We don’t stop handing out the gift cards.

        Also when we were struggling to get congressional approval to give them more gift cards, we let them raid our munitions cookie jar we had been storing with them in case we needed it for the past 40 years.

        It sucks, but I can understand why the US is so reluctant to give up their only long term ally in the region, who’s supported us in our unreasonable conflicts against immense global backlash. We also use them to funnel more taxpayer money to military contractors which are spread all over the US, financially benefiting many states in the process.

        As always it’s all about the money.