A Florida man is facing 20 counts of obscenity for allegedly creating and distributing AI-generated child pornography, highlighting the danger and ubiquity of generative AI being used for nefarious reasons.

Phillip Michael McCorkle was arrested last week while he was working at a movie theater in Vero Beach, Florida, according to TV station CBS 12 News. A crew from the TV station captured the arrest, which made for dramatic video footage due to law enforcement leading away the uniform-wearing McCorkle from the theater in handcuffs.

  • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    23 days ago

    Could this be considered a harm reduction strategy?

    Not that I think CSAM is good in any way, but if it saves a child would it be worthwhile? Like if these pedos were to use AI images instead of actual CSAM would that be any better?

    I’ve read that CSAM sites on the dark web number into the hundreds of thousands. I just wonder if it would be a less harmful thing since it’s such a problem.

    • RandomlyNice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 days ago

      Many years ago (about 25) I read an article in a newspaper (idk the name, but it may have been the The Computer Paper, which is archived on line someplace}. This article noted that a study had been commissioned to show that cp access increases child abuse. The study seemed to show the opposite.

      Here’s the problem with even AI generated cp: It might lower abuse in the beginning, but with increased access it would ‘normalise’ the perception of such conduct. This would likely increase abuse over time, even involving persons who may not have been so inclined otherwise.

      This is all a very complex. A solution isn’t simple. Shunning things in anyway won’t help though, and that seems to be the current most popular way to deal with the issue.

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        Actual pedophiles (a lot of CSA is abuse of power, not pedophilia - though to be clear fuck abusers either way) have a high rate of suicidal ideation because they think its as fucked up as everyone else. Of course we can’t just say “sure AI material is legal now” but I could imagine a regulated system accessed via doctors akin to how controlled substances work.

        People take this firm “kill em all” stance but these people just feel the way they do same as I do towards women or a gay man feels toward men. It just is what it is - we all generally agree gay isnt a choice and this is no different. As long as they dont act on it, I think we should be sympathetic and be open to helping them live a less tortured life.

        I’m not 100% saying this is how we do it, but we should be open to exploring the issue instead of full stop demonization.

        • HonorableScythe@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 days ago

          Dan Savage coined the term “gold star pedophile” in a column years ago, referring to people who acknowledge their attraction to children but never act on it by harming a child or accessing CSAM. I do feel bad for these people because there are no resources to help them. The only way they can access actual therapeutic resources for their condition is by offending and going to jail. If the pedophile goes to a therapist and confesses attraction to children, therapists are mandated reporters and will assume they’re going to act on it. An article I read a few years back interviewed members of an online community of non-offending pedophiles who essentially made their own support group since no one else will help them, and nearly all research on them is from a forensic (criminal) context.

          There’s a pretty good article by James Cantor talking about dealing with pedophiles in a therapeutic context here.

          Don’t get me wrong - I think offenders need to be punished for what they do. I unfortunately have a former best friend who has offended. He’s no longer in my life and never will be again. But I think we could prevent offenders from reaching that point and hurting someone if we did more research and found ways to stop them before it happened.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        23 days ago

        “Normalized” violent media doesn’t seem to have increased the prevalence of real world violence.

        • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          23 days ago

          I actually think video games reduce crime in general. Bad kids are now indoors getting thier thrills.

    • pregnantwithrage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      You would think so but you basically are making a patch work version of the illicit actual media so it’s a dark dark gray area for sure.

    • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      I guess my question is does access to regular porn make people not want to have real sex with another person? Does it ‘scratch the itch’ so to speak? Could they go the rest of their life with only porn to satisfy them?

      It depends on the person. I feel like most people would be unsatisfied with only porn, but that’s just anecdotal.

      I honestly think ai generated csam isn’t something the world needs to be produced. It’s not contributing to society in any meaningful ways and pedophiles who don’t offend or hurt children need therapy, and the ones who do need jailtime(and therapy, but Im in the US so thats a whole other thing). They don’t ‘need’ porn.

      My own personal take is that giving pedophiles csam that’s AI generated is like showing alcohol ads to alcoholics. Or going to the strip club if you’re a sex addict. It’s probably not going to lead to good outcomes.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      Think of it this way - what if the government said one day: “All child porn made in the before this date is legal, all child porn made after this date is illegal”.

      You would end up with a huge corpus of “legal” child porn that pedophiles could use as a release, but you could become draconian about the manufacture of new child porn. This would, theoretically, discourage new child porn from being created, because the risk is too high compared to the legal stuff.

      Can you see the problem? That’s right, in this scenario, child porn is legal. That’s fucked up, and we shouldn’t do that, even if it is “simulated”, because fuck that.

    • xta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 days ago

      by the same metric, i wonder why not let convicts murderers and psichopaths work at Slaughterhouses