• tomatobeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      170
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      My guess is OP is being sarcastic because progress to many people means more highways & cars. More construction and development.

      I wish we had more of this kind of progress near me (Colorado USA).

      • SSX@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Been in Colorado for the past week or so. You guys are a lot further ahead than Illinois is. Lots more bike paths and lanes, better traffic control that doesn’t result in stop and go movement, overall a lot more green space in your shopping centers and in human spaces, also lots more walking areas.

        Don’t beat up your state too much, it’s fantastic compared to mine. :'c

        • jbend@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m from So. IL originally and been to CO 4 times. Colorado is so much better in my opinion. People biking and jogging everywhere, everyone I met was really nice, like went out of their way to help my friends and I nice. Obviously that’s not everyone there, but it was the experience I had. Overall, it’s probably my favorite of the states I’ve been to and hope to go back, maybe permanently, someday.

          • DerKriegs@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d love to be a gatekeeper saying “we’re already full, turn back around”, but I’m a CA transplant myself. Personally, I’m looking to leave myself: too cold most of the year, and it’s getting really $$$. YMMV

      • yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, it certainly beats how it was before, but there isn’t less traffic now – they just put it in a tunnel.

            • yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              Compared to other countries, yes. And that’s not even comparing it to the US, which would be like kicking someone lying on the ground.

              Try riding a train in rural France, outside the 5 TGV lines, for instance, and you’ll pray for Deutsche Bahn. Ever been to the UK?

              But we could have much better PT if Germany weren’t the world’s greatest car exporter by far and the ministry of traffic deep in the pockets of automobile makers, that’s true as well.

        • Resistentialism@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          So, as a not very smart man. Wouldn’t underground roads be better? I feel with it being underground it’d be easier to manage pollution and install some things to fight it.

          • Piemanding@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Underground roads are crazy expensive. You need something to hold up the earth and anything else above it. There’s issues with water leaking in. Piping will have to go around it. If it breaks down somehow it will take longer to repair. It’s only really an option if the detour would be a lot longer or within urban areas for the extra space it frees up.

            • dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Or if you know, having greener spaces and roads underground are actually better for climate change. I’m not sure if this would help in that matter or not, but I think it’s a possibility. Not everything is about our made up concept of money.

              • Redscare867@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                1 year ago

                What’s better for climate change is less cars on the road, not underground roads. If we are going to be digging these expensive tunnels in every city they should be for subway systems. That would be a substantially better use of the funds and would be a good step towards reducing the emissions of a city. This is all assuming that we stop subsidizing car ownership so heavily of course.

                The entire process of building and repairing roads is pretty carbon intensive due to the amount of concrete involved.

              • AA5B@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yes, replacing surface roads with greenery is good for climate change, or more locally for reducing the heat island effect.

                They likely also redesigned the roads to reduce stop and go traffic, with all the extra pollution that creates.

        • VitaminDrink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This is exactly what happened. They just needed the roads AND the view. The amount of cars is still the same, if not more.

      • Resonosity@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s so backwards. Making this stretch of coastline walkable means more people show up, and if businesses realize this potential then they can capitalize. Makes sooo much sense

        • DanteFlame@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fun fact this is actually the Rhine river that runs sort of ⅔ of the way through Düsseldorf, similar to the Thames in London or the Seine in Paris.

          The other bank is much more residential and a little high end so it’s not really a gathering place for the population, whereas the bank shown in the picture is 2 blocks from a tram line that runs parallel to the river and runs into the heart of the CBD making it an extremely approachable body of water and pedestrian strip.

          On the weekends, the city holds public events to draw people to gather on this bank like food fares, carnivals, concerts. It’s always packed on the weekends and generates a shit ton of foot traffic for all the pubs and restaurants in adjacent streets.

          I had no idea all this was covered in highways just a few decades ago, making the city more walkable was an amazing choice. If you’ve never been to Düsseldorf before or don’t know anything about it, it is definitely one of the highlights of Germany once you’ve had your fill of all the war sites. Extremely liveable city without feeling overcrowded, and just a stones throw from the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, and France.

      • Lev_Astov@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel it’s more likely they don’t understand proper usage of quotation marks like that. They probably think they give emphasis; I see it all the time.

      • Suck_on_my_Presence@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wish Colorado would seriously put forth a passenger train between Pueblo to Denver or even Fort Collins.

        Utah has one from Provo to Ogden and it’s amazing. Beats driving in the psycho traffic.

    • snarf@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Obviously just being grammatically correct by putting the title in quotes!