• akilou@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    For what it’s worth, I don’t want tabs or AI in the sidebar. And I don’t want a sidebar

    • sysop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Instructions unclear, now you get two sidebars one for each side, another bar at the bottom, all filled with chatbots so you can chatbot while you chatbot. There’s a fee for each one though. Shit isn’t free.

  • Simon Weiss@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 days ago

    We used to joke in 2010s: what is Internet Explorer? It’s a program that is used to download a browser.

    Nowadays, what is Mozilla Firefox? It’s a repository you fork to make a browser.

    • sysop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      As long as I can use something that isn’t Chrome’s 0dayware with 5 CVEs a week, I don’t care how many people use it.

  • fossphi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 days ago

    But they’re also working on sidebar tabs. It’s out in nightly already

  • RedStrider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Don’t get me wrong, I think what Mozilla did is absolutely stupid. But unless it’s spying on you as you browse or whatever, how is this a problem? From what I see here in Developer Edition, it just iframes the chat window and docks it in a sidebar. It’s just bloat for people who don’t use it, or turn it off, and an upgrade for people who will use it.

    My only problem with it is that this kind of stuff should be an add-on.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I haven’t looked into the chatbot thingy at all yet, but if it meets basic quality standards (local LLM, not too large in size, actually helpful), then personally, I do actually think that it should be included by default, because it’ll primarily help out the kind of users who don’t know to install add-ons.

      Like, people had the same complaint with the translation feature they included, and I’m just seeing my dad who doesn’t speak English, who would never hear of such an add-on, where this just opens up a big chunk of the web to him.

      • egrets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Its functionality to integrate with whatever LLM you use - local or SAAS. I can’t say I’m excited about the feature, but I think it’s also a bit silly that people are angry about it (though I take the point about development priority).

        It’s healthy for Firefox’s market share to keep feature parity with Edge and other browsers that have the same function but with a manufacturer-pushed service.

        • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Wait, it’ll actually let you use local LLMs?

          That would legitimately help me out. I use LLMs a lot for simple data restructuring, or rewording of explanations when I’m reading through certain sources. I was worried they would just do a simple ChatGPT API integration and have that be the end of it, but maybe this will end up being something I’d actually use.