• Murvel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    But you do since you just guess. I quote known sources, and you pull shit out your ass.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Please explain why Putin would endorse the person who says that Ukraine should win the war over the person who won’t say that.

      • Murvel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t need to explain anything. Again, I’m just citing facts, and you’re guessing. But honestly, how much do you think your armchair analytics are really worth? Or anyone’s for that matter?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          I just cited facts too.

          Harris wants Russia out of Ukraine.

          Trump refuses to say what he wants Russia to do.

          Why would Putin sincerely endorse Harris? I think you know the answer is that he wouldn’t.

          • Murvel@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            2 months ago

            Because you, quote ‘don’t live under a rock’, was that the citation you consider a fact?

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              2 months ago

              Again:

              Harris says Ukraine should win.

              Trump will not say who should win.

              This happened last night. I heard it with my own ears.

              So, again, why would Putin support the person who wants him to lose the war? Because, again, I think you know the answer.

              • arefx@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                They could actually just be dumb and ignorant, but I think we both know they have their motives.

              • Murvel@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                2 months ago

                But holy mother of god!; what’s your source I mean?

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  My source of what? Those two claims? Again, the debate last night. Putin’s obviously bullshit endorsement of Harris? I can give you a source, but I’m not sure what your whole point here is if you didn’t know about that.

                  • Murvel@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Yes, of course, your source of why Putin made the endorsement, the source I asked for about 5 comments ago…

        • YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t need to explain anything.

          Don’t be coy; you simply cannot.

          You exist in bad faith, this goes so far beyond debate at this point lmao

          • Murvel@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I just cited a quote. What do you want from me exactly(?) holy fuck…

        • papertowels@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          There’s a big difference between citing facts and citing a statement. You likely have no evidence that the statement is a fact, besides taking the ex-kgb leader of an adversarial nations word at face value, which…does sound a little silly when you say it out loud like that, doesn’t it? Keep in mind this nation has definitely messed with our elections in the past too lol.

          • Murvel@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            The statement is the fact, and I put no more value to it than that. Make of that what you will, I really don’t care

            • papertowels@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              You are citing a statement, and it is a fact that the statement was said, but the content of that statement is not a fact because there’s very little evidence to support it being a fact. Lies exist, especially from the election meddling, ex KGB foreign adversary national leader types.