• 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I wouldn’t call them ‘better’ alternatives. They’re easier to install for sure. Personally, I’ve used revanced, newpipe, and libretube and love them all. I stuck with newpipe, since that’s what my family uses now, and it’s easier to troubleshoot when I have it too. And revanced takes some steps, more than just “install this package, done”.

      • Noxious@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’d say they are objectively better, because are independent, free & open source apps, instead of relying on patching Google’s proprietary software.

        • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          2 months ago

          They aren’t better IF you enjoy most of YouTubes features. Usability is key, and messing around with Revanced manager twice a year has been worth it easily.

          Being OS doesn’t suddenly make worse UX better.

        • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          I appreciate your viewpoint, as it’s a part of what makes the software development community so great. I don’t necessarily agree with it, personally, since they all rely on proprietary backend (YouTube), but I truly do appreciate it.

          • Noxious@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I just don’t want any proprietary software on my devices (for many reasons, most importantly privacy and user freedom). I can use a VPN to privately connect to the YouTube backend, but things get much harder when the proprietary spyware is actually on my device.

            • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              I don’t disagree with this point. Calling them objectively better however, is not covering the whole story imo. They are objectively better if your goal is to deproprietarize (not a real word) as much as possible. But if your goal is to just block ads as seamlessly as possible while still keeping all other features in YouTube, then those FOSS apps drop to subjectively better.

              • Noxious@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Well yeah, I agree. FOSS apps do lack features like logging in (to a Google account), the recommendation algorithm, etc. On the other hand, ReVanced is not exactly easy to install for new users. Both approaches are valid and get the job done (blocking annoying ads). I appreciate the calm and pleasant conversation.

                • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I agree completely. It’s actually why I went with NewPipe as a recommendation to family and friends. After a few months using it, I really didn’t miss the original YouTube app, and it has become, when combined with the ease of installation, my go-to recommendation for Android users who want to block ads and be able to play audio in the background with the screen off. All of these solutions have the potential to temporarily break as google (needlessly, imo) fights them. The FOSS solutions fix is to apply the update, where as revanced is to re-revance the YouTube app (not so simple).

                  And as for your calm and pleasant comment, I try to always be : ) we’re (mostly) all here to have a conversation (at least, I treat everyone as though they are, until they show me otherwise lol). So, thank you : )

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Which one of those do I pick if I actually want to be logged in and have Youtube keep track of my watch history, automatically synchronized between devices?

          • Noxious@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            If you want to use YouTube for that, it seems like ReVanced is your only option. But you can also create an account on a Piped instance, and have your playlists synced. LibreTube is the only app that supports this.

          • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Revanced with MicroG. I use YouTube 50/50 on mobile and Shield (SmartTube) and if my watch history, subscriptions etc. didn’t work, I wouldn’t be using it.

      • Noxious@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I know that it exists, I don’t think it’s a particularly good solution on Android though. There are native apps like the ones I mentioned before.

        Btw syncing an SQLite database with syncthing sounds painful. How often do you have to deal with sync conflicts?

    • littlewonder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Now do Android TV! All I want is to be able to allowlist channels for my kids but block everything else. I know an htpc is a better option but I’m lazy.