• NateNate60@lemmy.world
    1133·
    4 months ago

    I don’t have a problem with snaps as a technology. If you want to use them, then who am I to judge?

    But what I do have a problem with is when I don’t have a choice and I am being forced to use what the distro maintainers think is good for me. That is what finally made me quit Ubuntu and switch to Fedora.

      • Penta@lemmy.world
        506·
        4 months ago

        Well snap itself isn’t proprietary, the backend server distributing the snaps is.

        • frazorth@feddit.uk
          193·
          4 months ago

          Explain how this distinction matters in the real world?

          Snap distribution is as much a part of snaps as Snapd.

          Who cares that part of it is open source if other parts aren’t?

          • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
            53·
            4 months ago

            If Canonical folded Snap could be taken over by others who could build new server software for it, either from scratch or based off the other projects to develop alternative servers for it, and modify snap to accept multiple repos like that. That’s the difference, also just being able to fork snap like that. Though the fact it hasn’t been done says something about how many real snap enthusiasts there actually are.

            • frazorth@feddit.uk
              83·
              4 months ago

              If Canonical folded, someone else could come along and reinvent everything on the server side. And that makes it Open Source?

              • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
                44·
                3 months ago

                What makes it open source is the fact that the parts which matter most are open source. The part that installs on the system is open source, and because of that it can be more easily tweaked and modified to accept other servers. In actuality it can be modified to do so right now, it’s just that there is little reason to do so because the amount of people enthusiastic about snap isn’t very large, as it has many other problems besides just the centralized server infra.

    • InverseParallax@lemmy.worldEnglish
      283·
      4 months ago

      I do have a problem with them, the same problem was solved, better, with other technologies like appImage (which doesn’t litter your mount list with 100 meaningless entries).

      Even flatpak is better, snap is an also ran they’re trying to force on us without being as good as any of the competitors.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      6·
      4 months ago

      when I don’t have a choice and I am being forced to use what the distro maintainers think is good for me.

      That’s the case on literally any distro.
      And just like on literally any distro, you can also install Firefox from FlatPak, the Mozilla repo or from source.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipEnglish
        113·
        4 months ago

        Except on Ubuntu it just installs the snap regardless. If you don’t pay attention you may not even realize that it is a snap. Also the snap store is controlled exclusively by one company with a questionable history.

        • superkret@feddit.org
          6·
          4 months ago

          Read my comment again:

          install Firefox from FlatPak
          the Mozilla repo
          or from source

          In none of these cases will Ubuntu be able to install it from snap instead.
          Only the Firefox “package” in the Ubuntu repos actually just links to a script that installs the snap.

  • originaltnavn@lemm.ee
    331·
    4 months ago

    This is literally the reason why I switched over to Debian. At least back then, snaps wouldn’t work if the home folders were not under /home/<username>, breaking all computers on the system I helped run.

  • mumblerfish@lemmy.world
    22·
    4 months ago

    Installed ubuntu on an rpi and firefox there ran snap. Was not very usable. Everything was so slow. Forcing an install of the dep package was the only way to use it. Not very well thought through bu cannonical.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    19·
    3 months ago

    8.10 was the last good Ubuntu. (It also had the best default wallpaper ever)

    If you look at the “improvements” in every release since, you’ll notice that shit like they do currently isn’t an accident:

    9.04 integrated web services into the main user interface.
    9.10 integrated Ubuntu One (Ubuntu’s OneDrive, upgradable for money) by default and introduced the slooooow Ubuntu Software Center
    10.04 integrated an interface to post on social media
    10.10 added app purchases in the Software Center
    11.04 made Unity the default
    11.10 removed Gnome as fallback to Unity
    12.04 introduced the buggy HUD
    12.10 added the famous Amazon ad lense to it by default

    and it goes on like this…

  • President@sh.itjust.works
    151·
    4 months ago

    Wait… I’m just about to switch over to Linux on a laptop and was going to use Ubuntu. This looks kind of cursed though?

    • loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works
      35·
      3 months ago

      Tbf, Unbuntu works, but they’re ran by a company which has made some questionable choices. You can still go with it if you don’t care too much, it has the advantages of being user friendly and well documented.

      If you’d rather not, but you want something not too far and equally easy, you can go with Linux Mint, which is based on Ubuntu but disables snaps. They also offer differently choices of desktop environments, the default being Cinnamon (which looks a bit more like windows), and another being Mate, which is closer to Gnome.

      They also have a “Debian Edition”, which aims to stop being dependant on Ubuntu and may or may not replace the default edition someday, but so far it’s not the one they recommend for new users.

    • rtxn@lemmy.worldMEnglish
      211·
      4 months ago

      Switching to Ubuntu is way, way better than staying on Windows.

      That being said, Ubuntu is maintained by the Canonical company, and they have made some really sus decisions in the past. Things like putting Amazon ads in the application launcher and then trying to gaslight people when the inevitable backlash arrived.

      The meme above refers to Canonical’s own Snap packaging format (think of it like UWP/Microsoft Store apps vs. “regular” Win32 apps), and the way they’re pushing for its adoption. Snap is installed by default on Ubuntu and official Ubuntu flavors. You can uninstall it manually, but Canonical has modified the APT package manager so that when an application is available as a Snap package, it automatically installs the Snap back-end and the application as a Snap package without notifying the user (instead of installing the .deb-packaged applications, which is what happens on all other distributions that use APT). Canonical recently also ordered that official Ubuntu flavors (which are maintained by independent groups) can’t include Flatpak, a universal packaging format that directly competes with Snap, in their default installations.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipEnglish
      8·
      4 months ago

      Just install something else like Linux Mint or Pop OS. Ubuntu doesn’t seem to want to respect your rights as a user. You do one thing and the sneakily do something else. Its a bit like how Microsoft makes Edge the default after an update.

    • InverseParallax@lemmy.worldEnglish
      6·
      4 months ago

      It’s not as bad as it looks, especially if you aren’t hardcore, but for long-term linux users it’s not great.

      Debian has become what Ubuntu wanted to be: An easy, clean distribution that basically just works, which is a major reversal.

      Also consider fedora.

      But don’t be worried about Ubuntu, it’s still completely usable.

    • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
      83·
      4 months ago

      Ubuntu’s packet manager Apt was already kind of awful in many ways, especially with its PPA hell. But them adding Snap packages somehow managed to make them reach even new levels of awful.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      4·
      4 months ago

      Pick whatever looks best. It’s not a big of a deal as we make it out to be.

      Fedora KDE is also an awesome choice though if you must choose something else.

    • burgersc12@mander.xyz
      2·
      4 months ago

      KDE Neon or EndeavorOS are also options, depending on whats important to you in a distro. I recommend getting a live usb so you can boot into linux and try it before installing the whole system.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        22·
        4 months ago

        Can’t recommend EOS. Awful community when something breaks. Definitely not something for people coming from Windows.

        • burgersc12@mander.xyz
          1·
          4 months ago

          Awful community? Its Arch, which is regarded as having one of the most comprehensive guides and as long as you find someone willing to not be a dick, the community is great!

          • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
            2·
            4 months ago

            I’m specifically talking about the EOS forum, which was just dicks throwing insults towards me having a support request and the admins consequently closing the thread and hiding it, telling me to make a new one if I still need support.

            • burgersc12@mander.xyz
              1·
              4 months ago

              Why the hell you on EOS forum? Never looked at it, didn’t realize it was a cesspool. But like, no ones forcing you to use that shitty forum? I doubt most EOS users even bother to look at it.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      33·
      3 months ago

      Ignore the noise and go with Ubuntu LTS. When you get comfortable with that, you could try Debian.

      You could play it backwards too. Try Debian, if you can’t get it to do what you want, wipe and do Ubuntu LTS. But I do not recommend this path if you have no idea what you’re doing. People underestimate how difficult it is to do simple things when you don’t know how to, no matter how trivial.

    • ikidd@lemmy.worldEnglish
      12·
      4 months ago

      The AIO docker compose container is far better, and I’ve run Nextcloud in pretty much every installation path in the last decade, using baremetal, my own docker, snap, NCPi, and VMs. All of them have had issues with updating, backup and the host going sideways for some reason or another. The AIO has been flawless for far longer than any of them managed.

    • Pulsar@lemmy.world
      6·
      4 months ago

      You are 👍, nextcloud needs like 2 admin per each user. The snap version works fairly well even after a lot of virtualization layers. Proxmox -> Ubuntu LXC -> Snap -> Nextcloud

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipEnglish
          8·
          4 months ago

          I can’t say I agree. BSD isn’t widely used or supported and the jails require manual setup and maintenance. Meanwhile docker compose and other container runtimes are well supported and can easily spin up and down environments based on a declarative configuration.

          • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
            33·
            4 months ago

            No that’s insecure, which is the whole point of containerization in the first place and subsequently purpose of jails within BSD

  • renzev@lemmy.world
    6·
    3 months ago

    One of my friends spent like a month distrohopping just to find a debian-based distro that fits these two criteria:

    • First-class support for KDE

    • Isn’t broken all the time

    Ubuntu fails both. KDE Neon excels on the first one, but fails harder than ubuntu on the second one. Kubuntu as well. Debian has horridly outdated packages, and he refuses to use nix/flatpak. Tuxedo OS is obscure and broken. Mint is great, but installing KDE takes some effort.

    He finally settled on Ubuntu Server with the native KDE package. Still has to do some weird incantations to banish snap tho.

    How did things get this bad?

      • renzev@lemmy.world
        2·
        3 months ago

        You are about to do something potentially harmful.
        To continue type in the phrase ‘Yes, do as I say!’

        But speaking seriously, I think he tried it for a while and didn’t like it either… not sure why specifically tho, I’ll ask him

    • Rolling Resistance@lemmy.world
      3·
      3 months ago

      When I used Mint, it felt like packages are outdated just like on Debian (based on Ubuntu LTS + needs time to rebase onto a new one).

    • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOPEnglish
      3·
      3 months ago

      Why not try Void. It’s fairly up to date regarding all packages, including KDE and it’s rock solid.

      • renzev@lemmy.world
        2·
        3 months ago

        He really insists on debian-based, I don’t really know why. And, while Void IS really solid, it isn’t exactly known for the most expansive package collection. Xournal, for example, is not available through XBPS (there is a xournal package, but it just installs xournal++), which is one of the programs he likes a lot. I told him it’s on nix, but he doesn’t want to use nix.

        But I agree, Void is amazing, I use it on my laptop. One little-known cool feature of Void is that its official docker images come in busybox/musl libc, busybox/glibc, and coreutils/glibc variants, it gives you a nice scale from most minimalist to most compatible.

        • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOPEnglish
          3·
          3 months ago

          He could make his own templates for the packages… he doesn’t even have to rebuild. If he could at least find a .deb or .rpm package of the app/package he likes, he could use that and just repackage. That’s what I do for stuff I can’t find… and update them from time to time (like every few months or so).

    • renzev@lemmy.world
      11·
      3 months ago

      I like your comment a lot because you can substitute a lot of different things for “snap” and it still ends up sounding like a very reasonable opinion

      I feel like I would be more okay with leaded gasoline if it didn’t still have a lot of very real flaws.

      I feel like I would be more okay with anarcho-capitalism if it didn’t still have a lot of very real flaws.

      I feel like I would be more okay with PFAS-coated cookware if it didn’t still have a lot of very real flaws.

      I feel like I would be more okay with single-use plastic bags if it didn’t still have a lot of very real flaws.

      I feel like I would be more okay with cryptocurrencies if it didn’t still have a lot of very real flaws.

      I feel like I would be more okay with generative AI if it didn’t still have a lot of very real flaws.

      I feel like I would be more okay with eating highly processed meat if it didn’t still have a lot of very real flaws.

  • vala@lemmy.world
    51·
    4 months ago

    IMO the biggest issue with snaps in the sandboxing. Makes so many apps unusable for development.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipEnglish
      1·
      4 months ago

      And there broken design. They are way overly complex and snapd requires large amounts of permissions. They also add a ton of overhead and make everything slow.