• Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Explicitly combatants… and anyone who happens to be in their vicinity when the bomb goes off.

      “Extremely” targeted you say? So when they were detonated, the people doing the detonating had visual confirmation of the targets not being in close proximity to civilians?

    • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Since this targets explicitly combatants

      Hezbollah is, also, a political party. It’s military wing was formed to fight the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        From what I can tell online its militant wing predates the political wing. Just adding that in because I thought it might be the other way around based on your comment

      • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        The people getting these communication devices aren’t exactly the kitchen personnel

          • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            Do you think Hezbollah gave her a pager? What was her father’s position within Hezbollah? Maybe he’s the one that fired some rockets that killed someone else’s kids recently

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              I’ll engage with your shitty whataboutism after you answer which it is: were the bombs “surgical” and killed a 9-year-old girl on purpose, or were they sloppy attacks which caused civilian casualties on accident?

              Customary international humanitarian law prohibits the use of booby traps – objects that civilians are likely to be attracted to or are associated with normal civilian daily use – precisely to avoid putting civilians at grave risk and produce the devastating scenes that continue to unfold across Lebanon today. The use of an explosive device whose exact location could not be reliably known would be unlawfully indiscriminate, using a means of attack that could not be directed at a specific military target and as a result would strike military targets and civilians without distinction. Human Rights Watch

              • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                2 months ago

                Although they did kill that girl (and others) on accident, the attack as a whole seems to have been far more surgical that what we usually see in this conflict (and dare I say, certainly more surgical than most attacks from Hezbollah)

                • Dasus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  You can’t have it both ways.

                  Either it was “very surgical” and still killed a small girl (ie the girl was targeted) OR Israeli attack methods are so indiscriminate and poorly aimed they end up killing INNOCENT CHILDREN.

                  It’s one or the other.

                  • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    That’s a very childish way to look at it.

                    Imagine if Hezbollah managed to send a missile right up Bibi’s bedroom window and killed both him and, unbeknownst to them, some child that was with him. Would you then conclude that it was an ‘indiscriminate’ attack? Would you not make a difference between that and say a carpet bombing where they just try to level the city block he’s in?

                    Please use more caps and bold formatting in your posts

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Customary international humanitarian law prohibits the use of booby traps – objects that civilians are likely to be attracted to or are associated with normal civilian daily use – precisely to avoid putting civilians at grave risk and produce the devastating scenes that continue to unfold across Lebanon today. The use of an explosive device whose exact location could not be reliably known would be unlawfully indiscriminate, using a means of attack that could not be directed at a specific military target and as a result would strike military targets and civilians without distinction. Human Rights Watch