Who can suggest an ethical SMTP provider for low volume transactional mail? I’m willing to pay up to 2€/month for a few hundred mails per month.

  • FlightyPenguin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    21 days ago

    I don’t know what you mean by “ethical”, but I use Sendgrid. They have a free tier that can send up to 100 emails a day.

    • callcc@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Amazing! Now this is something I haven’t heard of. I think we might have a winner here! Best thing, I could use it for transactional mail on all my websites for 10€/yr. Including as many inboxes as needed. Nice!

      • tofubl@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        EU servers might be worth something to some people, depending on where they are in the world. And while 190% is indeed “way more expensive”, relatively speaking, it’s still “well under” your goal of EUR 2 per month.

        • callcc@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 days ago

          That’s actually a good point. Will need to think about server location and GDPR compliance.

    • wraith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 days ago

      I’ll second PurelyMail. Easy to set up and they have explainers for all the various settings. I pay $10 a year for “unlimited” domains and mailboxes (some caveats but for minimal mail we won’t hit any limits).

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    21 days ago

    “Low volume” vs. “A few hundred mails per month”

    OK, what of the above?

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 days ago

      A few hundred a month is just a few per day. That is pretty low volume by most standards.

      I would say in general if the SMTP server could be replaced by a single human writing and mailing snail-mail letters by hand it qualifies as low volume.

    • callcc@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      This is something you used to be able to do for free, no problem. It’s only a few of the big mail accepting companies being extra shitty about accepting mail making this tough. Looking at you Microsoft. So a few hundred mails per month is ridiculous both on storage, bandwidth and CPU consumption.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        I know. I was there, before Sanford Wallace invented the email spam and forced any sane SMTP server into password protections and whitelists.