• capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    Note how I left out theft. That’s because you can’t directly use violence to protect property.

    I remember hearing this when I lived in the UK for a few years and I was blown away. What are you expected to do if being robbed? Let it happen?

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      There is a solution, it’s called insurance. I know that you wouldn’t get your family heirlooms back, but neither would you being armed but not home.

      I know the other guy wouldn’t say it, so I’ll go ahead and do it: you sound like you’re out for revenge, but you don’t know on whom to exact it. I fear that you could end up shooting a porch pirate in the back while claiming self defense.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        There is a solution, it’s called insurance. I know that you wouldn’t get your family heirlooms back

        Then it isn’t exactly a solution, is it? The jewelry probably only would appraise for <$1000 (probably far less). It’s not about the monetary cost.

        but neither would you being armed but not home.

        Yeah…? I don’t get this line of argument. This just in - guns only effective when there’s a human there to operate it. No shit…

        You’re simultaneously arguing that guns are overkill to solve theft and that guns don’t solve theft.

        I fear that you could end up shooting a porch pirate in the back while claiming self defense.

        The state I live in currently wouldn’t allow for me to use deadly force to protect property. But states I’ve lived in in the past sure would. As of now, I would have to be in fear of great bodily harm or death in order to employ deadly force and that’s the standard I will follow. Just keep in mind that many robberies involve a deadly weapon on the perpetrators side which is an immediate green light on my end.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      You do what the police do, and provide a proportionate response.

      A gun is only to be used if you are in imminent danger of your life. A robbery is arguably not that, unless they’re trying to steal your organs or prostheses.

      There’s a reason your average supermarket security guard doesn’t immediately whip out the Mini-Nuke the moment they see a shoplifter.

      There’s also something to be said about the place you’re living in, where you’re to be terrified of stabbists and robberers the moment you step out-of-doors. Do you live in a hive of scum and villainy?

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Call the police. Are you in physical danger? If not why are you putting yourself in physical danger?

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I don’t think I understand your question.

        What scenario are you imagining with these questions?