• aeronmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think a large part of it is how most of the machines that could run 7 can run everything after 7 (maybe just need more RAM), but many many MANY machines running XP couldn’t move forward because the CPU or the integrated graphics just couldn’t take it.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        My hard drive couldn’t take all the background shit in 10, it would literally stutter scanning my files. When I tried to disable the anti-virus and it told me “I’m sorry, Dave. I’m afraid I can’t do that”

        • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m not trying to judge, but you installed and ran a modern operating system on a spinning platter drive?

          I had to switch to SSDs in 2016 because macOS was dragging hard on a Pro notebook.

          • iopq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            My old laptop doesn’t have an M.2 slot

            It ran fast enough in windows 8 and linux. It only became unbearable on windows 10

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        And XP was 32 bit only, it was really an updated version of Win2k, which was really rock solid.

        Which kind of supports your point.