The buyer, a New York-area leasing company called American Lease, says in a new filing that Fisker now believes there is no way to transfer the information connected to each SUV to a new server not owned by the bankrupt EV startup. Since American Lease needs that information to operate the vehicles after Fisker is dissolved, the leasing company has filed an emergency objection to the startup’s liquidation plan.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 months ago

    … Fisker now believes there is no way to transfer the information connected to each SUV to a new server …

    There is absolutely a way. It might be hard, but there is a way.

    • lettruthout@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was thinking the same thing, but the article doesn’t go into any detail. So the information is on a Fisker server and associated with each vehicle? If so, moving it to another server seems like basic data managment.

      • vortexsurfer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not an expert, but the only thing I can imagine is that it’s related to certificates or keypairs used for encrypted communication / authentication. Afaik ssl certificates can be issued to a given company, for example, and might become invalid when that company no longer exists. Or it becomes impossible to issue new ones.

        Something in that vein, maybe.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    We keep adding connected tech to products that have no business having that tech.

    I don’t want a car that needs software updates. Or a goddamn Bluetooth soldering iron.

  • stangel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    The problem is not cars that use software - that is inevitable and OTA updates are far superior (if properly secure) than having to take the thing into a shop.

    The problem is these people can’t or won’t write databases and systems that transfer from one data center to another. That stinks of either incompetence or bad faith.

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Probably the stuff requires back end connection to properly work. So just the data is useless as it has references in the database to all sorts of other systems/applications and it would require all this data to also be available.

      • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        well, then, they should make those systems available to port the data or entire applications over en toto, it’s not like Fisker is going to be doing anything with them

        • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Probably… but that would mean it’s kinda a “you need the whole Fisker system” like they said.

  • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    What cloud based information could my physical car need to be operational? I know the shift to software defined cars means there is more relience on tech and the company that makes the car but what could they possibly be keeping server side? If it’s needed to use the car what would happen if you drive the car somewhere there isn’t wifi/cell service? Does the car just stop?

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      A link to the purchase database for the options (checked when the car is turned on), the car telemetry data live uploaded, maintenance data (checked on start) to show maintenance and recall info and OTA update check, security and authorisation systems for admins of the back end. They might even have a remote call in to allow them to disable the car if it’s not paid. Is it needed… from a corporate perspective absolutely.