• Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    Turns out, if you’re further left than either realistic candidate (because FPTP), it makes it really easy to figure out who you should vote for. “I wonder if I should vote for the person who’s not left enough for my liking, or the one is so far beyond that as to be the diametric opposite of left. Whatever shall I do?”

  • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t understand how the Democrats in USA can be considered left-wing. Sure, they are more left than the Republicans, but in my eyes they certainly not left-wing.

    • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I don’t know what country you are from or how your voting system works. But I will guess that your country has many parties and after the election, a governing coalition is formed.

      In the US voting system, similar parties get punished by stealing votes from each other. So, in effect, we have to form our coalitions before the election and choose the single candidate that will stand for all of us. So, you can think of the Democratic Party as the Democratic Coalition, made up of some truly left-wing factions, as well as some not very left-wing or even centrist factions, and so our candidate will be much more watered down than what you’d see in a different system.

      • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        I am from Sweden. You are correct that my country has many different parties that together form a governing coalition.

        Thank you for making it a bit clearer to me! I appreciate it.

      • sudo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Calling the democratic party a “coalition” is extremely generous. It’s historically been a corrupt patronage network since Van Buren and any attempt to make it represent the will of its voters is thwarted internally. Its history is a graveyard of progressive movements.

      • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        “The United States is also a one-party state, but with typical American extravagance, they have two of them.” - Julius Nyerere

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Easy. We set the FBI on all the actual leftists decades ago. So the movement is having to slowly rebuild itself in the US. As a result Progressives are the farthest left things most Americans have experience with.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      In the American sensibilities, the Democrats are left wing.

      I know we’ve shat on Americans too many times that Democrats are not leftists and Republicans are far-right, but there is a place and time for doing so and I learned to cut Americans some slack. Americans simply have different Overton window because of different history and culture (I have explained before as to why, but I cannot be bothered to write another wall of text about it). Other countries don’t even follow a left and right political dichotomy. Many places, especially in developing countries, vote on personalities than policies. But few of us crap on people from developing countries for not following policy-based discourse, or not following the European-originated sensibilities of “left or right” politics.

      • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Americans are heavily propagandized and are politically illiterate. Generally speaking, they do not even know there is a world beyond “liberal” (Democrat) and “conservative” (GOP). It is considered nerdy and wonkish to even know very much about the two party bourgeois electoral system. So their sensibilities only mean as much as propaganda has eliminated any possibility of political education, let alone capacity for action in solidarity with humanity (even when empathy is there, correct analysis is not) for the vast majority of them. That requires developing projects dedicated to political organization and education outside and away from the two bourgeois parties.

        Americans should only be cut slack to the extent that they are ignorant. They should not be cut slack for their knowing embrace of war, domination, racism, and so on. And when you simply inform them of the existence of such things, they will rapidly educate you in their commitment to the project. Perhaps they will momentarily feel bad, but most of the time they will quickly find a psychological salve for cognitive dissonance, lest they act outside of the tracks laid down for them by reactionary and genocidal capital. Our work on the left is to peel off more and more from those tracks and turn them into fellow track-peelers, this is naturally an opportunity for exponential growth if we can consistentlu break past what keeps them on-track.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        We don’t currently have our own special political spectrum.

        We can make a new one for you so you can feel better about this whole situation. Let’s call it the “the imperial political spectrum”. I’d be happy with that solution. Then you can say you’re left on the imperial political spectrum and it’s all good.

    • Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Because American politics is weird and partisan a f.

      Anything even remotely left will get you labelled a Commie or tankie by the right, while anything remotely right will get you labelled a Nazi by the left.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        while anything remotely right will get you labelled a Nazi by the left.

        Yeah it’s crazy how attacking the White House just cuz you can’t deal with the results like an adult gets a group a bad rep. What an unfair world what with actions having consequences and all that.

        • Clbull@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Oh it’s been like that long before January 6th, and long before Trump even stepped foot in the Republican primaries eight years ago.

          That wasn’t me defending Jan 6th either. Trump’s little Beer Hall Putsch was frankly inexcusable, and the fact that he’s likely not going to face any kind of criminal repercussions for it makes the US look weaker than the Weimar Republic.

    • coolusername@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      surely if you enable a genocide that makes you extreme right right? so it’s extreme right and extreme right

      • Eiri@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Eh, not sure it’s got anything to do with the political spectrum anymore. At this point I’m not sure what to call it but the US and allies’ obsession for maintaining ties with Israel no matter what feels divorced from… Well, a lot of things, really. But among them the left/right spectrum.

        I can’t talk much. Canada is also selling Israel the supplies they use to do their mass murdering.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        No, this is literally where the U.S. falls on a global political spectrum. The Democrats would be considered center-right in most other nations. Even by their own historical standards, they’re center right; if you took a Democrat from 1975 and transported them to 1995, they’d ask you why the party had adopted the Republicans’ fiscal policies.

  • Fickle_Ferret@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    The Left begins with anti-capitalism. If you aren’t against capitalism, you aren’t left.

    • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Libs are seething at this absolute correct take. If you’re pro free market, you’re a liberal and thats as ‘left’ as you’ll ever be.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s actually a really good layman’s explanation. I’m going to use that combined with, “you’re not a capitalist just because you support them. Capitalists are the people who own the capital.”

  • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’d like to see memes that are embracing the left but with a clear cut against authoritarianism. This one is too ambiguous.

    • Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      Didn’t Castro lead the group that freed their country from the dictator Batista?
      They have a very high literacy rate now. Their life expectancy is quite decent in their region.
      And they have good healthcare.

      All this in about 60 or so years, while being under sanctions and other crisis.