• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    If the child is going to die either way, it isn’t a greater threat. It’s an equal threat.

        • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t understand, are you upset that they choose to fight back instead of sit back and die regardless? Again, the genocide has killed over 8 times as many children. How is your focus not on the genocide.

            • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              No, I’m saying it’s the material conditions that are responsible, which are caused by the ongoing genocide. How would I know any of their motivations, I have no idea what it’s like it grow up under a genocide.

              You’re still not recognizing that the root cause of all of this is still the genocide. Ending that is the only way to end the child recruitment, not bombing them more.

              Human Rights Watch has also documented the Houthis’ use of much-needed humanitarian assistance to recruit men and children to their forces. At least 21.6 million people in Yemen, about two-thirds of the population, need some form of humanitarian assistance, and 80 percent of the country struggles to put food on the table and access basic services, according to the UN Population Fund.

              “While the main reason for families to send their children is their position supporting the Palestinian cause, Houthis offer salaries and food baskets for families of those who are willing to join them, which works well given the deteriorated humanitarian and economic situation,” said a female human rights activist in Sanaa.

              The ongoing US and UK-led airstrikes on Yemen have reportedly increased domestic support for the Houthis, strengthening the Houthis’ ability to recruit children. Maysaa Shujaa Aldeen, a researcher at the Sana’a Center For Strategic Studies, told the Washington Post that the “Houthis are connecting their attacks in the Red Sea to support [for] Gaza, which is a moral pretext for most people in the MENA region. These attacks have increased their ability to recruit, especially in the northern tribal areas.”

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 month ago

                The root cause is irrelevant when it comes to forcing child soldiers onto the front line. There is no way to frame that other than flagrant human rights abuse. Trying to excuse human rights abuses because someone else is committing genocide is ridiculous and sickening.

                • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  The genocide is not irrelevant, are you being intentionally obtuse here? That is the main relevance. It’s the direct cause of the conditions in Yemen and the main cause of death by a wide wide margin. If you don’t care about the root cause, you don’t genuinely care about the problem or it’s resolution, because you’re ignoring the obvious solution of ending the genocide

                  • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    They aren’t being obtuse. They’re just an idealist. They likely believe the decisions people make and the things they choose to believe in are detached from the circumstances in which people find themselves. In their mind, morality is self evident and anyone committing an immoral act, as they define it, could simply choose not to.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    And now you’re just lying. Just like you were lying about children choosing to be soldiers. It’s no different than saying children choose to be sex workers.

                    It’s also a war crime.

                    There is no such thing as a necessary war crime. There is no such thing as a forgivable war crime. Genocides have repeatedly been stopped without child soldiers being used to stop them, something I’m sure you know. Child soldiers were not necessary to end genocides in Rwanda or the Balkans.

                    So you can lie about me not caring about genocide all you like. It doesn’t change the fact that forcibly sending children to their deaths is never necessary and always completely reprehensible. There is no moral justification for sending children to die.