• _NetNomad@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    2 months ago

    i’m really interested to see where this goes. i feel like a lot of the dorks (i say affectionately as a dork) who use the fediverse and people who do this kinda shortform video are two circles that don’t touch, so this could very well die on the vine- no pun intended- or it could give the fedi the jolt it needs to enter the mainstream

    • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m really skeptical of its success primarily due to the immense costs of hosting video. Peertube exists already, and isn’t nearly as successful as Mastodon/Lemmy primarily due to its hosting costs.

      • jeffhykin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yeah I wish there was a way to contribute to the hosting with torrent-like seeding. My phone can seed a torrent, but its not going to host an instance.

        1 like = seed for 1 month seems like an interesting model

        • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Naah I thought about this before and came to the conclusion that this isn’t that bright of an idea. Here’s why.

          Why’s video hosting so expensive in the first place? Because it needs a lot of computational power, storage and bandwidth. All three things that a mobile phone does not have. If you make your client’s mobile phone do this stuff, then you’re going to slow down their phone, make it heat up more, make it degrade faster (because it would be drawing power from the battery) and take up a huge chunk of their bandwidth.

          Think of how video calls drain battery really fast. It’s just shifting the costs of hosting from the hosting side to the consumer side while making the entire operation a lot more complicated and a lot more inefficient.

    • Fitik@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      I use TikTok (around a hour a day) and use the Fediverse too(Mbin and Misskey fork), so I guess I am a target audience, so they do touch, pfft

      Also there’s Pixelfed userbase, I think they would like short form video platform, cause Instagram has it

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 months ago

    Storage costs is the biggest hurdle for decentralized video platforms. I wonder how instances will handle that.

  • e$tGyr#J2pqM8v@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    shorts are not my cup of tea. Pretty sure shorts have a negative impact on peoples attention span. I’d still be happy to see people watch their shorts on the Fediverse rather than at tiktok/yt. Of course, but still…

    • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sorry I stopped reading your comment after four words. Could you condense it to a five second clip with another following on within a secon sorry I forgot what we were talking about

      • Classy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sorry, I couldn’t follow your comment. Could you please interlay a second text in a different color that has poop jokes so I can have enough things to focus on? An injected mp4 of someone stapling sheet aluminum would help, too.

  • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    Just a tip for the developer/sysadmins of loops.video, as a developer myself: Seems like loops.video has no DKIM or SPF configured (if that’s the domain being used to sent activation links/codes), so the tendency is for most email providers to block the mail or move it straight to Spam folder. The situation worsens when many users try to sign-up for an account, so loops.video sends a lot of sequential emails (which is something that could be seen as “spam behavior” by email providers). The developer should ensure that mail delivery is properly configured, particularly the trust headers (DKIM and SPF, as mentioned before) needed for sending emails.

    • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Seems like loops.video has no DKIM or SPF configured (if that’s the domain being used to sent activation links/codes), so the tendency is for most email providers to block the mail or move it straight to Spam folder. The situation worsens when many users try to sign-up for an account, so loops.video sends a lot of sequential emails (which is something that could be seen as “spam behavior” by email providers). The developer should ensure that mail delivery is properly configured, particularly the trust headers (DKIM and SPF, as mentioned before) needed for sending emails.

    • asudox@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Be patient. It seems like they are manually sending out activation emails. You should receive it this week.

  • zerozaku@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why do I need to create a new account for it? At least it should let me sign in with pixelfed account right?