Summary

Jacob Hersant, a self-described Nazi, was sentenced to one month in prison, becoming the first person in Australia jailed for performing an outlawed Nazi salute.

Convicted in Victoria for making the salute outside a courthouse in October, Hersant’s act followed new legislation banning the gesture.

Magistrate Brett Sonnet justified the sentence, citing Hersant’s intent to promote Nazi ideology publicly.

Hersant’s lawyer argued that his actions were nonviolent and claimed they were protected as political expression, stating plans to appeal the ruling on constitutional grounds.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    52
    ·
    7 days ago

    I don’t like Nazis for sure, but I also don’t like people being jailed for expressing their views and speech. So my thought would be to get like two or three hundred protesters together and all go to that courthouse and make that salute and make them arrest every one of them. If the court system wants to waste their own time and tons of taxpayer money, prosecuting people for free speech, then let them do so. Kind of like Iran using $2,000 drones to cost Israel $2 million missiles.

    • TurnpikeRangers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      “I don’t like Nazis” “We should get 300 people to give the Nazi salute outside a courthouse”. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. Shut the fuck up. I say this with all the sincerity in my heart, you are a moron and you are part of the problem. You are contributing to the rise of alt-right and fascist leaders around the world. There is zero leeway in this argument, everything Nazi related is bad and none of it should be tolerated.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        31
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yes, and I think that you should be one of the people who shows up outside the courthouse and does it. Not because you are a Nazi, but because they will arrest you and you’re making a point.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      Hate speech is not free speech. That’s as simple as it gets. Most rational countries understand this.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      300 Nazis outing themselves and going to prison to (hopefully) be rehabilitated with counseling?

      Don’t threaten me with a good time.

      (I am aware the prison system is not super fantastic in Australia, but we’re miles ahead of the US, and some of this 300 may actually be dissuaded. And also, they’re Nazis, so. If you believe your fellow human beings are animals, then you don’t get free speech, sorry.)

    • Geobloke@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      Australia doesn’t have the first amendment because we aren’t the US. We do however think that if you want to talk shit and start fights, we have the legal right to tell you to calm the fuck down with extreme prejudice, see exhibit a.

    • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Not how it works. Gestures, like words, have a meaning. Even in the USA, saying certain words in certain ways can get you arrested; harassment, threats, etc. This gesture is meant to convey threat and to harass religious and racial minorities. There is no other reason to make the gesture.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        This gesture is meant to convey threat and to harass religious and racial minorities.

        I’d even take it a step further and say it’s a gesture made by a very dangerous minority that threatens the vast majority.

        Nothing says “I’m willing to forgo my humanity to wage pointless violence on literally the rest of the world.” like the cringiest dipshit salute ever devised.

        • chingadera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          It just seems performative and works against your other point. It would be nice to flip a magic switch and get rid of Nazism, but at the same time, you’re right that you can’t just decide what free speech is allowed and what is when it comes to this. I get it for words or phrases that cause immediate danger like, bomb, fire, etc.

          Everything else is a slippery slope, especially given how creative our supreme court is (US)

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m Canadian. We have hate speech laws. 99% of us are never going to be hindered by or in any way affected by these hate speech laws. Because 99% of us aren’t going around being Nazis and calling for violence and the extermination of ethnic races.

    • Wolfram@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      No, fuck off with your take. That is free speech taken to a literal extreme. Allowing free speech to this extent encourages fascist and Nazi movements to flourish. Nazis should feel uncomfortable or unable to express these views.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Eco warriors should worry about being imprisoned for going to demonstrations. These are the kinds of things that can happen when you give your government power to jail people they do not like.

        Edit: What happens if Australia’s equivalent of Donald Trump gets in office and enact the policy mentioned above?

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          Edit: What happens if Australia’s equivalent of Donald Trump gets in office and enact the policy mentioned above?

          See because they have reasonable limits on supporting fascism publicly, there’s less of it going around, so they don’t exactly have an equivalent demented child-raping fascist to vote for.

        • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Not every country has such a paranoid view of their government as Americans do. Some systems function a bit better when the people want something done.

          • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            25
            ·
            7 days ago

            Wasn’t it Australia that I read about basically having concentration camps in 2020 for the pandemic? All I’m saying is that you do not question your government at your own peril.

            • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              7 days ago

              They were not concentration camps, people arriving in Australia were asked to isolate for 2(or maybe 3) weeks.

              At least look things up before giving political hot takes. And while you’re looking things up, try to understand what paradox of intolerance is.

        • Wolfram@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 days ago

          Despite free speech supposedly legally allowing protests and demonstrations there is still a real risk of being imprisoned.

          My point is even “free speech” is not total free speech in the United States for example. There are still compromises in free speech so we may preserve order. Allowing free speech to that extent lets these movements flourish.

          • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            7 days ago

            I absolutely agree. But we as a society need to be very careful because we cross some divides at our own peril. Today it might be Nazis making a salute. Tomorrow it might be journalists writing oposing views.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        7 days ago

        Who decides what is and is not a crime? Does a crime need a victim? It does the victim have to be physically harmed in a crime for it to be considered a crime.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          7 days ago

          Go ahead, go outside onto the streets, and proclaim “I want lots of people murdered. The more we murder, the better. We really should get started now, what are you waiting for” and see where that’s going to end, even in places like the US. Then realise that showing the Nazi salute expresses that exact same thing.

          There’s no such thing as non-criminal fascism. Thus advocating for it is advocating for, condoning, approving etc. of crimes which is a crime literally everywhere, rightfully so.