• seaQueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    Or we could just get the neolibs out of the core of the Democratic party. They’ve been more concerned with corporate donor profits than the welfare of the working class since the 90s.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t really see that happening, since you’re essentially divorcing wealth from power, and you have a better chance at abolishing capitalism. Ultimately we need a shift of consciousness in this country, but I ain’t holding my breath.

      • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Start at the local level and build up. It’s a lot easier to have strong progressives run in races that might not really be all that contested in the first place. And make even small primaries count

        That kind of power starts to add up. The local politicians tend to flow up the party. Obama first rose from the Illinois state senate. Tim Walz first rose from an unexpected flip in a deep red house district in Minnesota

        Power doesn’t always flow top down. It also flow from the bottom up

        • the_artic_one@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Power primarily flows from the bottom up. The top just tries really hard to make sure we don’t know that so we aren’t able to organize and wield it. If power really came from the top then dictators wouldn’t bother to hold sham elections.